“…The Daniel et al (1998) study, including associated laboratory direct shear tests, produced several key findings: (1) for reinforced GCLs, GMX/GCL interface shear strengths were lower than internal shear strengths under low normal stress conditions, (2) the NW GT side of a reinforced GCL had higher interface strength than the W GT side when placed against a GMX, (3) hydrated bentonite migrated through the W GTs of some reinforced GCLs and reduced GMX/GCL interface strength over time, (4) the 2H:1V test plots were too steep to yield a safety factor that is normally considered adequate and the 3H:1V test plots yielded safety factors of at least 1.5 for project conditions, and (5) observed failures and non-failures were consistent with limit equilibrium stability analyses using peak shear strengths obtained from short-term shear tests. Based on this latter observation, Daniel et al (1998) concluded that the Cincinnati test plots confirm the accuracy of current design methods and thus field test sections should generally not be required. Daniel (2013) noted, in hindsight, that the 2H:1V failures are not surprising because slope angles were close to interface friction angles and that results of the project pointed the industry toward using NW/NW GCLs to deliver enhanced interface shear strength for slope applications.…”