1975
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slope of Gradients for Performance as a Function of Achievement Motive, Goal Distance in Time, and Future Time Orientation

Abstract: It was predicted that (a) individuals high in motivation to approach success and low in motivation to avoid failure (approach-oriented) would increase their performance and (b) those with the opposite motivation constellation (avoidance-oriented) would decrease their amount of performance as a distant future achievement task (goal) approached in time. Furhter, it was assumed that individuals high in future time orientation (FTO) would perceive a distant future event (goal) as nearer in time than those who are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
4

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Gjesme, 1975;Horstmanshof & Zimitat, 2007;Husman & Lens, 1999;Lens, Simons & Dewitte, 2001;McInerney, 2004;Peetsma, 2000) has focused on the assumption that stress on future is THE OLIVE TREE EFFECT instrumental towards increasing students' motivation to study. Lens & Tsuzuki (2005) and Simons, Lens, Dewitte and Vansteenkikste (2004) have suggested for instance that understanding the future benefits of present learning tasks creates an instrumental motivation for students.…”
Section: When the Future Is Threateningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gjesme, 1975;Horstmanshof & Zimitat, 2007;Husman & Lens, 1999;Lens, Simons & Dewitte, 2001;McInerney, 2004;Peetsma, 2000) has focused on the assumption that stress on future is THE OLIVE TREE EFFECT instrumental towards increasing students' motivation to study. Lens & Tsuzuki (2005) and Simons, Lens, Dewitte and Vansteenkikste (2004) have suggested for instance that understanding the future benefits of present learning tasks creates an instrumental motivation for students.…”
Section: When the Future Is Threateningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is characterized by "extension" and "valence" (see e.g., Gjesme, 1975;Lens, 1986). Perspective refers to the representation of certain events or objects in the near or more distant future.…”
Section: Students' Goals and Time Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las diferencias individuales en la extensión (longitud y profundidad) de la PTF no resultan sólo del establecimiento de la meta motivacional; también tienen consecuencias motivacionales (De Volder y Lens, 1982;Gjesme, 1975;Lens, 1986;Raynor & Entin, 1982). Ellas afectan la intensidad de la búsqueda de la meta presente, por ejemplo en la motivación estudiantil.…”
Section: Efectos Motivacionales De La Perspectiva De Tiempo Futurounclassified
“…Los efectos motivacionales de las jerarquías de tarea y de tiempo son opuestos. Basán-dose en las hipótesis sobre gradiente de metas de Miller, Raynor asumió y encontró (Raynor & Entin, 1982), como Gjesme (1975), que la motivación de logro resultante típica será más intensa cuando la longitud cronológica de la senda es más corta.…”
Section: El Futuro En La Motivación De Logrounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation