Landslide Science and Practice 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31325-7_56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slope Angle as Indicator Parameter of Landslide Susceptibility in a Geologically Complex Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more extensive geomorphological interpretation of covariate effects (e.g., Donnarumma et al, ; Johnston& Christensen, ; Li et al, ; McFadden et al, ; Meunier et al, ; Parker, , ; Selby, ) is provided in the supporting information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more extensive geomorphological interpretation of covariate effects (e.g., Donnarumma et al, ; Johnston& Christensen, ; Li et al, ; McFadden et al, ; Meunier et al, ; Parker, , ; Selby, ) is provided in the supporting information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slope angles are known to be a key parameter in estimating susceptibility to developing earth flows (Donnarumma et al, 2013). The TRI is defined as the mean difference between a central pixel and its surrounding cells (Wilson et al, 2007) and can be used to quantify landscape heterogeneities, which could exert influence on the localisation of the triggering area of shallow landslides (Persichillo et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both variables contributed to increase the landslide intensity (hence the susceptibility) in all the SUs. From a geomorphological perspective, terrain slope controls the balance of the retaining and the destabilising forces acting on a slope (Taylor, 1948;Wu and Sidle, 1995;Donnarumma et al, 2013), and in many areas and Figure 9: Regression coefficients of all covariates, whose coefficients were significant in at least one of the fitted models, Mod1 (pink), Mod2 (blue), Mod3 (orange), Mod4 (yellow), and Mod5 (brown). Diamonds show posterior means; triangles show pointwise 97.5 and 2.5 posterior percentiles bracketing 95% pointwise credible intervals.…”
Section: Covariates Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%