2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijspm.2016.082907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SLMToolBox: enterprise service process modelling and simulation by coupling DEVS and services workflow

Abstract: Market competition is pushing companies to differentiate themselves from competitors by developing customized services in addition to their original production (either physical or digital). It drives the emergence of service process modelling to describe more precisely the composition of services. Nevertheless, business initiatives modelling can be very complex to set, laying at the heart of many business decisions and demanding a lot of time and effort to handle and operate unambiguously. A well-designed and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also many works related to workflow modeling and simulation like Bazoun et al (2016), Ougaabal et al (2019), and Chen et al (2015), which can be considered as related to this paper. However, the main difference in this work is that this work relies on modeling and simulation as a base to determine the complexity of workflows as a variable that affects the suitable workflow modeling.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also many works related to workflow modeling and simulation like Bazoun et al (2016), Ougaabal et al (2019), and Chen et al (2015), which can be considered as related to this paper. However, the main difference in this work is that this work relies on modeling and simulation as a base to determine the complexity of workflows as a variable that affects the suitable workflow modeling.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge of this work is the lack of a standardised representation of DEVS models despite some works of Simulation Interoperability Standards Organisation and DEVS Standardization Group (Garredu, 2013). In Bazoun et al (2016), ATL and XSLT are also used to obtain final DEVS models that can be viewed and simulated by the DEVS simulator. In fact, ATL transformation is applied to transform conceptual level of service processes models into business process modelling and notation (BPMN).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, there are some studies In the literature using BPMN model with DEVS model, these studies are based on meta-model approach (OMG 2003), which is one of the most used transformation techniques that includes the mapping of BPMN concepts to DEVS concepts. Based on the proposed approach of BPMN to DEVS (Cetinkaya, Verbraeck, and Seck, 2012) which presented a Model Driven Development (MDD) framework for modeling and Simulation (MDD4MS), and where a set of transformation rules were defined: some BPMN concepts (Pools, Lane, SubProcess) were mapped to DEVS coupled component while task, event (start, end and intermediate) and Gateway were mapped to DEVS atomic component (Bazoun et al, 2016). This proposal doesn't cover the intervention of different resources like (human resources, devices and/or Software services) which may affect the execution of the task.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%