2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip-line field model of micro-cutting process with round tool edge effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the effect of v C on the size of the unsafe zone is negligible for realistic machine tool and cutting parameters with the exemption of low cutting speeds where process damping becomes relevant [14,15], or at low chip loads [2]. In other words, the size of the unsafe zone depends mostly on the cubic power of the chip thickness variation in (1), and it is roughly constant all along the lobes whatever vibration (chatter) frequency v C occurs in the system.…”
Section: Unsafe Zone Of Stationary Cutting With Respect To Chattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the effect of v C on the size of the unsafe zone is negligible for realistic machine tool and cutting parameters with the exemption of low cutting speeds where process damping becomes relevant [14,15], or at low chip loads [2]. In other words, the size of the unsafe zone depends mostly on the cubic power of the chip thickness variation in (1), and it is roughly constant all along the lobes whatever vibration (chatter) frequency v C occurs in the system.…”
Section: Unsafe Zone Of Stationary Cutting With Respect To Chattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cutting force identification tests are affected by the variations of material microstructures at different batches, dependency on cutting speeds and chip size. Due to uncertainties in the material behaviour, continuum mechanics modelling of chip formation [1,2] does not substitute the cutting experiments. Sample cutting force dependencies on chip thickness obtained from experiments and modelling approaches published in the literature are given in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stagnation angle in their model is 58:5 AE 0:5 with the UCT of 2 to 20 lm and cutting speed of 100 m/ min. Jin et al [125] proposed a slip-line model for microcutting considering the effect of tool edge radius. The model based on the existence of stagnation point on the tool edge and the stagnation angle is calculated by the finite element model.…”
Section: Influence On Chip Formation and Minimum Uctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 shows the mechanism of chip generation when the uncut chip approaches the honed edge of the cutting tool. At the separation point [21], indicated by separation angle (β) in Fig. 3, uncut chip breaks into two parts.…”
Section: Modeling the Geometry Of Drill Lipsmentioning
confidence: 99%