2011
DOI: 10.1080/15583724.2011.615961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip at Fluid-Solid Interface

Abstract: The `no-slip' is a fundamental assumption and generally-accepted boundary condition in rheology, tribology and fluid mechanics with strong experimental support. The violations of this condition, however, are widely recognized in many situations, especially in the flow of non-Newtonian fluids. Wall slip could lead to large errors and flow instabilities, such as sharkskin formation and spurt flow, and hence complicates the analysis of fluid systems and introduces serious practical difficulties. In this article, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
(1,623 reference statements)
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, sorption mechanisms associated with electrostatic forces often lead to a cushion of polymer molecules that can strongly affect the macroscale flow (see Brochard and Gennes (1992)) for a description of different regimes). On the other hand, repulsion mechanisms-originating from a variety of phenomena such as steric hindrance (Joanny et al 1979), electrostatic repulsion (Uematsu 2015), or migration of polymer molecules away from high-shear regions (Cuenca and Bodiguel 2013)-can lead to a depletion layer close to the solid/liquid interface ((see Auvray (1981)) and the very good reviews from Barnes (1995) or Sochi (2011) for more details). The concentration of polymer is then lower in the depletion layer than in the bulk, leading to a lower viscosity in the vicinity of the wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, sorption mechanisms associated with electrostatic forces often lead to a cushion of polymer molecules that can strongly affect the macroscale flow (see Brochard and Gennes (1992)) for a description of different regimes). On the other hand, repulsion mechanisms-originating from a variety of phenomena such as steric hindrance (Joanny et al 1979), electrostatic repulsion (Uematsu 2015), or migration of polymer molecules away from high-shear regions (Cuenca and Bodiguel 2013)-can lead to a depletion layer close to the solid/liquid interface ((see Auvray (1981)) and the very good reviews from Barnes (1995) or Sochi (2011) for more details). The concentration of polymer is then lower in the depletion layer than in the bulk, leading to a lower viscosity in the vicinity of the wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, different tools are available. Molecular dynamics approaches, often with simple molecules, are useful to understand the fundamental physics at the molecular level (Rouse 1953;Joshi et al 2000;Sochi 2011). However, simulations cannot yet be performed on sufficiently large volumes to model flow in porous media, especially in the case of polymer solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower consistency is by Barnes [3] suggested to be due to oil separation between the base oil and the grease thickener agent. The concept of wall slip can be divided into two categories: i) true slip, where there is a discontinuity in the velocity field at the fluid-solid interface, and ii) apparent slip, where there is an inhomogeneous thin layer of a fluid adjacent to the wall with different rheological properties to the bulk of fluid enabling fluid movement [27]. Li et al [19] also showed that in a free-surface flow oil bleeding is present where the grease is sheared.…”
Section: Wall Slip and Flow Evolution In The Elbow Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Ellis fluids, the volumetric flow rate as a function of the pressure drop in a circular cylindrical tube with a constant radius over its length assuming a laminar incompressible flow with no slip at the tube wall [51] is given by the following equation [22,52] …”
Section: Ellis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%