Slingram EMI Devices for Characterizing Resistive Features Using Apparent Conductivity Measurements: check of the DualEM‐421S Instrument and Field Tests

Abstract

International audienceThis article addresses the characterization of resistive archaeological targets and near surface structures by electromagnetic induction (EMI). It presents tests achieved with the DualEM-421S instrument (Dualem Inc., Milton, Canada) in order to be able to quantitatively compare these measurements to the standard technique of direct-current (d.c.) resistivity. The test was done over the Gallo-roman site of Vieil-Evreux in Normandy, France and one-dimensional (1D) and three-dimensional (3D) inversions were applied to the data set obtained. We have first investigated the signal-to-noise ratio of each of the six DualEM receiver coils both in a static mode and for a quad-pulled system. The dependence on the roll angle was also measured and it is shown that rotation of DualEM must be taken into account if the roll angle is more than ±10°. Absolute calibration and in-phase/quadrature (out of phase) component discrimination was checked by measuring the response of a small conductive and non-magnetic sphere. Several electromagnetic soundings by measuring the instrument response at different heights were done in order to check the quadrature (out-of-phase) response of the instrument. Inversions of these electromagnetic soundings were compared to d.c. vertical electric soundings (VESs) over four locations and found in accordance. Several maps using different coil configurations (HCP, VCP, PERP) and different heights were performed and inverted, both for a wide mesh (5 m) and for a finer one (0.5 m). The wide mesh allows a global and rapid description of the surface geology context (continuous d.c. measurements cannot deliver equivalent depth of investigation). The fine mesh conductivity maps clearly show the walls of a fanum (temple) as well as other structures and prove that the DualEM-421S is able to map correctly archaeological resistive targets. These maps and their interpretations were compared to previous results obtained by d.c. technique

Improved Geoarchaeological Mapping with Electromagnetic Induction Instruments from Dedicated Processing and Inversion

“…Given that any electromagnetic (EM) method in the low frequency range [16] is diffusive and integrates a large volume based on the footprint of the system, this approach will inevitably smoothen out real soil structures. A few authors have suggested to perform a full inversion of the EMI data without assuming the LIN approximation [29][30][31], but it is our impression that this is not common practice. For airborne instruments of a similar type, the industry standard has been to perform a full processing and inversion of the data [32,33].…”

Searching for the History of the Ancient Basilicata: Archaeogeophysics Applied to the Roman Site of Forentum

“…During the last forty years, archaeologists have disagreed about the identification of the site, referred to in ancient literary sources as Forentum, and possibly situated in the current towns of Forenza or Lavello. Archaeological discoveries during the past thirty years seem to confirm that Lavello is the Samnitic settlement cited by Livius (9.20.9) and Diodorus Syculus (19,65,7) as the site conquered by the Romans in 318 or 315 BC. In particular, the hill of Gravetta is one of the most interesting and important places for understanding the transition from the Daunii civilization (which inhabited northern Apulia before the arrival of the Romans) to the Roman domination of the territory, with the delicate intermediate Samnitic phase between the fourth and third century BC.…”

“…The integration of different geophysical techniques is key for the success of geophysical techniques applied in archaeological fields [19]. There is a large number of documented examples of the integration of MAG and GPR, where MAG is used to give a large-scale reconstruction of the anomalies related to archaeological features, while GPR is often applied to obtain details of the most interesting anomalies.…”

What Exists Beneath the Place Where Conrad Schlumberger Achieved the First (1912) Electrical Prospection Experiment

“…As expected, anomalies corresponding to resistive features are less marked and readable with this method than with DC measurements (Dabas et al . ); however, it is of value to confirm the DC resistivity results through independent measurements.…”