2003
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.5.1086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slime-trail tracking in the predatory snail, Euglandina rosea.

Abstract: Euglandina rosea, a predatory land snail, tracks prey and mates by following slime trails. Euglandina follow slime trails more than 80% of the time, following trails of their own species, but not those of prey snails, in the direction that they were laid. The attractive elements of prey slime are small, water-soluble compounds detected by specialized lip extensions. Although olfaction plays no role in trail following, strong odors disrupt tracking. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase also disrupts slime trail … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppression of NO synthesis in the behaving snail (Teyke, 1996) or slug (Sakura et al, 2004) blocks fine odor discrimination or odor learning. These observations of degraded odor processing and odor learning after inhibition of NO synthesis are paralleled by findings in ewes (Kendrick et al, 1997), honeybees (Müller, 1996;Hosler and Smith, 2000), the predatory snail Euglandina (Clifford et al, 2003), mice (Okere et al, 1996), and rats (Samama and Boehm, 1999). The relationship between nitric oxide and synaptic plasticity has been reviewed recently (Susswein et al, 2004).…”
Section: A Comparative Perspectivementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Suppression of NO synthesis in the behaving snail (Teyke, 1996) or slug (Sakura et al, 2004) blocks fine odor discrimination or odor learning. These observations of degraded odor processing and odor learning after inhibition of NO synthesis are paralleled by findings in ewes (Kendrick et al, 1997), honeybees (Müller, 1996;Hosler and Smith, 2000), the predatory snail Euglandina (Clifford et al, 2003), mice (Okere et al, 1996), and rats (Samama and Boehm, 1999). The relationship between nitric oxide and synaptic plasticity has been reviewed recently (Susswein et al, 2004).…”
Section: A Comparative Perspectivementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Since the closely related leech H. marmorata is able to detect and follow its prey by waterborne odors (Simon and Barnes 1996), it is plausible that W. laevis can also detect, follow and distinguish the species and size of snails by means of waterborne odors. However, because several malacophagy predators of different taxa have been found to detect and follow prey snails by their mucus trail (e.g., the pulmonary snail by Clifford et al 2003; the nudibranch sea slug by Carté and Faulkner 1986; the planarian by Ogren 1995; the slug snake by Su and Tu 2004, and the ground beetle by Weather 1989), it is also possible that W. laevis can detect its prey by tactile chemoreception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rosy wolfsnail Euglandina rosea uses chemosensation for hunting its prey (Clifford et al 2003;Shaheen et al 2005) and has a PC lobe with oscillating local field potentials (LFPs) (Harrington et al 2004), as in Limax (Gelperin and Tank 1990) and Helix (Nikitin and Balaban 2000;Nikitin et al 2005). Hunting dogs use olfaction for trail following (Hepper and Wells 2005) and use active odor sampling, or sniffing (Gazit et al 2003;Schoenfeld and Cleland 2005;Settles 2005), as an essential component of their odor sampling strategy.…”
Section: Oscillations and Active Sampling In Olfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%