2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sliding Window and Regression Based Cup Detection in Digital Fundus Images for Glaucoma Diagnosis

Abstract: Abstract. We propose a machine learning framework based on sliding windows for glaucoma diagnosis. In digital fundus photographs, our method automatically localizes the optic cup, which is the primary structural image cue for clinically identifying glaucoma. This localization uses a bundle of sliding windows of different sizes to obtain cup candidates in each disc image, then extracts from each sliding window a new histogram based feature that is learned using a group sparsity constraint. An -SVR (support vect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our algorithm to state-of-the-art reconstruction-based [7], pixel [1], sliding window [2] and superpixel [3][18] based methods. In addition, we compare our system against the current clinical standard for glaucoma detection using intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and to CDR values from expert graders.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our algorithm to state-of-the-art reconstruction-based [7], pixel [1], sliding window [2] and superpixel [3][18] based methods. In addition, we compare our system against the current clinical standard for glaucoma detection using intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and to CDR values from expert graders.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for richer classification features than pixel-based methods, and faster processing than sliding window techniques with comparable accuracy. In addition, in contrast to the supervised approaches [7], our method requires no training procedure. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[4] describes using variational level-set methods to accommodate to the boundary of the optic cup. Recently, [7] introduced a machine learning framework based on sliding windows for optic cup segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods like threshold [7], r-bend [7], ASM [18], regression [16] are well compared in the latest papers like [2], [11] and so on. So we conducted experiments to compare with the superpixel based method [2] and the spatially weighted fuzzy c-means(SWFCM) based method [11].…”
Section: Comparision With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%