1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574799001502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sliding mode with adaptive estimation force control of robot manipulators interacting with an unknown passive environment

Abstract: In this paper, a force control algorithm for robot manipulators is introduced, where the dynamics of non-rigid environment interacting with the robot is assumed unknown. The controller design is based on the combination of sliding mode control techniques and the adaptive estimation theory, so the introduced controller compensates the structured or unstructured uncertainty of the environment. The main source of feedback information is received from a wrist force sensor. The designed controller includes addition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model-based inverse dynamics with and without coordinate partitioning have been investigated by Siciliano and Villani (2001) and Parra-Vega and Arimoto (1996), respectively; and adaptive joint control for constrained systems yield the simultaneous asymptotic convergence of position and force tracking errors, as reported by Stepanenko and Chun-Yi (1995). In addition, the first-order sliding mode control produces an exponential tracking at the expense of the chattering whose discontinuity is rendered at a high frequency (Lian and Lin, 1998;Tsaprounis and Aspragathos, 1999). However, to implement these approaches, it is necessary to know exactly the robot dynamics or at least a set of physical parameters (Arimoto, 1996).…”
Section: Constrained Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model-based inverse dynamics with and without coordinate partitioning have been investigated by Siciliano and Villani (2001) and Parra-Vega and Arimoto (1996), respectively; and adaptive joint control for constrained systems yield the simultaneous asymptotic convergence of position and force tracking errors, as reported by Stepanenko and Chun-Yi (1995). In addition, the first-order sliding mode control produces an exponential tracking at the expense of the chattering whose discontinuity is rendered at a high frequency (Lian and Lin, 1998;Tsaprounis and Aspragathos, 1999). However, to implement these approaches, it is necessary to know exactly the robot dynamics or at least a set of physical parameters (Arimoto, 1996).…”
Section: Constrained Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is chosen for formation control because it allows a systematic approach to the problem of maintaining stability and consistent performance in the face of modeling imprecision. Further, it is a proven method applied to a number of applications such as robot manipulators (Tsaprounis and Aspragathos 1999), underwater vehicles (Innocenti and Campa 1999), marine crafts (Fahimi 2007a), helicopters (Fahimi 2008), automotive engines (Bhatti et al 1999), electric motors (Proca et al 2003) and power systems (Dash et al 1996).…”
Section: Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust force control is used to achieve the target dynamics such as the target impedance, and to preserve the stability robustness in the presence of modeling errors in the robot and in the environment [6]. The design concept of sliding mode is widely used in order to overcome the difficulty to achieve a robust control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust control law is usually built by employing Lyapunov's direct method. The designed robust control guarantees the achievement of the predefined target dynamics, while preserving stability in the presence of modeling errors [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%