1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-89838-8_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sliding Mesh Simulation of Transitional, Non-Newtonian Flow in a Baffled, Stirred Tank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the previous results (Jaworski et al, 1996) for the Rushton turbine and on the general literature, it was expected that the quality of the CFD modelling for the new impeller would be the best if the sliding mesh option were applied. This approach is potentially the most promising in analysing flows from various impellers and the solutions provide angle-resolved velocities in the whole tank.…”
Section: H=tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the previous results (Jaworski et al, 1996) for the Rushton turbine and on the general literature, it was expected that the quality of the CFD modelling for the new impeller would be the best if the sliding mesh option were applied. This approach is potentially the most promising in analysing flows from various impellers and the solutions provide angle-resolved velocities in the whole tank.…”
Section: H=tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard practice in BFC is to assign a constant grid index (one of the three 1, J or K ) to the meshed surface. Because of the overlap of the blades required for good gas dispersion (Nienow, 1996), these requirements could not be met. Therefore, another approach was also used.…”
Section: Meshing For a Sliding Mesh Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations