1996
DOI: 10.3109/01485019608987089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slide Preparation and Staining Procedures for Reliable Results Using Computerized Morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thin smears facilitated sperm morphology assessment by avoiding sperm cell overlap and ensuring that the sperm were scattered at the same focal depth. The airdried slides were stained with Diff-Quik stain (Merck Diagnostica, Darmstadt, Germany) as previously described (30). Briefly, the slides were fixed for 20 seconds in solution 1, stained for 10 seconds in solution 2 and for 10 seconds in solution 3, and washed in water.…”
Section: Sperm Morphology Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thin smears facilitated sperm morphology assessment by avoiding sperm cell overlap and ensuring that the sperm were scattered at the same focal depth. The airdried slides were stained with Diff-Quik stain (Merck Diagnostica, Darmstadt, Germany) as previously described (30). Briefly, the slides were fixed for 20 seconds in solution 1, stained for 10 seconds in solution 2 and for 10 seconds in solution 3, and washed in water.…”
Section: Sperm Morphology Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperm concentrations for CAMA slides were adjusted to the optimal number as previously established in our laboratory (Lacquet et al, 1996). In this phase we compared the two optimal staining methods as identified in phase one.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used both with standardized methods and with variables for analysis [21,23,24], these machines provide high repeatability and precision compared with subjective npg morphological evaluation [25,26]. However, problems of cell recognition, image digitization [2], and the effects of staining procedures [11] cannot be avoided and the process is time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%