2007
DOI: 10.1094/pdis-91-7-0906a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slender Wheatgrass is Susceptible to Smut Caused by Ustilago phrygica from Turkey

Abstract: Slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachycaulus (Link) Gould ex Shinners subsp. trachycaulus), family Poaceae, tribe Triticeae, is a native North American grass that is used as a livestock forage. Ustilago phrygica, a systemic ovary-smut fungus, is native to Turkey and West Asia and is pathogenic on Aegilops spp. and Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski subsp. asperum (Simonk.) Melderis (medusahead), an invasive weed in the western United States that is targeted for biological control. An isolate of the fungus (U.S.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological control agents are not currently commercially available for managing medusahead. Although many types of fungus that cause crown and root rot have successfully reduced seed production in medusahead, they have also proved to also be fairly detrimental to desirable native grasses and/or cereal grain crops (Berner et al 2007;Grey et al 1995;Siegwart et al 2003). No insects have been identified for use in the management of medusahead.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological control agents are not currently commercially available for managing medusahead. Although many types of fungus that cause crown and root rot have successfully reduced seed production in medusahead, they have also proved to also be fairly detrimental to desirable native grasses and/or cereal grain crops (Berner et al 2007;Grey et al 1995;Siegwart et al 2003). No insects have been identified for use in the management of medusahead.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data 8 Stoll et al (2003) 9 Piepenbring et al (2002) 10 Berner et al (2007) 11 Cunnington & Shivas (2006) 12 Begerow et al (2006) 13 Bakkeren et al (2000)…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%