2021
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2021.3056219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SleepRunner: A 28-nm FDSOI ULP Cortex-M0 MCU With ULL SRAM and UFBR PVT Compensation for 2.6–3.6-μW/DMIPS 40–80-MHz Active Mode and 131-nW/kB Fully Retentive Deep-Sleep Mode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For B = 125 kHz, which is the typical bandwidth used in Europe [3], the minimum required frequency increases from 20.9 MHz to 23.2 MHz when increasing the SF from 7 to 9. Such frequencies are easily attained by ULP MCUs as they commonly have CPU frequencies in the range 32 -180 MHz [11]. We note that the minimum CPU frequency does not increase monotonically with the SF as the FFT implementation of the CMSIS library is more efficient for FFT sizes with an even power of two.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Minimum Cpu Frequencymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For B = 125 kHz, which is the typical bandwidth used in Europe [3], the minimum required frequency increases from 20.9 MHz to 23.2 MHz when increasing the SF from 7 to 9. Such frequencies are easily attained by ULP MCUs as they commonly have CPU frequencies in the range 32 -180 MHz [11]. We note that the minimum CPU frequency does not increase monotonically with the SF as the FFT implementation of the CMSIS library is more efficient for FFT sizes with an even power of two.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Minimum Cpu Frequencymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Table 2 shows a comparison with recently published IoT end-nodes and fully programmable clusters. Compared to traditional single-core IoT end nodes [29], [30], the proposed work delivers significantly better performance and efficiency thanks to the exploitation of parallelism. Compared to similar fully programmable multi-core IoT endnodes [23], [31], implemented in 40nm and 22nm technology nodes, respectively, the proposed SoC delivers similar performance and energy efficiency on an 8-bit format, despite the less scaled technology node used for its implementation.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to a traditional low-power programmable IoT system such as [35], representative of a wide range of low- cost microcontrollers embedding CortexM0, DARKSIDE delivers several orders of magnitude better integer (8-bit) peak performance and also 1.9× better energy efficiency, despite SleepRunner [35] is implemented in a more scaled technology node (28nm FD-SOI). Contrarily to DARKSIDE's cluster, the implementation strategy of SleepRunner is highly optimized to operate at very low voltage (i.e.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%