2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/xdzrv
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleeping for Two: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia in pregnant women

Abstract: Insomnia and sleep disturbances are common in pregnancy and have potentially significant consequences for both maternal and infant health. There is limited research examining the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) during pregnancy. With increased distress and limited access to services during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is also an unprecedented need for telehealth delivery of treatment programs for pregnant women. The primary aim of the trial is to evaluate the impact of in-pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the respondents who were worried about someone with a close network getting infected had greater odds of insomnia. These findings were also in line with other Western and South Asian countries ( 24 , 76 80 ). It can be assumed that fear of closed ones being infected, COVID-19-related myths, stigma, and distrust in healthcare bodies have given rise to fear and thus worsened the mental health status of the urban poor ( 81 83 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, the respondents who were worried about someone with a close network getting infected had greater odds of insomnia. These findings were also in line with other Western and South Asian countries ( 24 , 76 80 ). It can be assumed that fear of closed ones being infected, COVID-19-related myths, stigma, and distrust in healthcare bodies have given rise to fear and thus worsened the mental health status of the urban poor ( 81 83 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%