2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep patterns of co-sleeping and solitary sleeping infants and mothers: a longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
43
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with earlier studies using maternal reports of infant sleep (DeLeon & Karraker, 2007). They are also consistent with Volkovich et al (2015), who found that, whereas mothers in co-sleeping arrangements reported higher levels of infant night waking, this link was not borne out by actigraphy, and that it was actually mothers in co-sleeping arrangements, but not infants, whose sleep appeared to be disrupted in co-sleeping arrangements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are consistent with earlier studies using maternal reports of infant sleep (DeLeon & Karraker, 2007). They are also consistent with Volkovich et al (2015), who found that, whereas mothers in co-sleeping arrangements reported higher levels of infant night waking, this link was not borne out by actigraphy, and that it was actually mothers in co-sleeping arrangements, but not infants, whose sleep appeared to be disrupted in co-sleeping arrangements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Relevant to this question, however, was whether increases in mother-reported infant night waking would be corroborated by actigraphy, and whether co-sleeping would also be associated with increased wakefulness and sleep fragmentation among parents. Volkovich et al’s (2015) findings suggest that mothers’ reports of infant sleep will not be corroborated by actigraph reports, and that actigraph data would indicate that it will be mothers’, not infants’ night wakefulness, that will be increased in co-sleeping arrangements. We will determine if these patterns are replicated in the present study, and whether paternal sleep, which was not examined by Volkovich et al, is linked with sleep arrangements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It also conflicts with other data that room-sharing is associated with more sleep disruption for mothers. 24,38 Our data showing shorter night sleep and shorter sleep bouts for infants who are room-sharing has potentially important consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…21 The 1-year recommendation has questionable congruence with the epidemiology of SIDS (as risk is far lower after 6 months), and it runs counter to the common clinical advice parents receive. Based on evidence of improved infant sleep, [22][23][24] clinicians may encourage parents to establish independent sleep environments (ie, in a separate room from parents) during the middle of the first year to promote healthy and sustainable sleep patterns before the typical onset of separation anxiety later in the first year. 25 Therefore, in this secondary data analysis, we sought to evaluate the associations between room-sharing on a separate sleep surface and sleep-related outcomes from the cohort participating in the Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) study.…”
Section: Nihmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is important to keep in mind that maternal sleep is both highly variable between postpartum women and is not stagnant within women across the postpartum period [89,90]. As such, our use of averages to model the number and duration of awakenings cannot be broadly applied to all postpartum sleep experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%