2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06871-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep-like cortical OFF-periods disrupt causality and complexity in the brain of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients

Abstract: Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) patients may retain intact portions of the thalamocortical system that are spontaneously active and reactive to sensory stimuli but fail to engage in complex causal interactions, resulting in loss of consciousness. Here, we show that loss of brain complexity after severe injuries is due to a pathological tendency of cortical circuits to fall into silence (OFF-period) upon receiving an input, a behavior typically observed during sleep. Spectral and phase domain analysis o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

27
172
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
27
172
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to its activity-dependent nature, cortical bistability and the associated OFF-periods can be better revealed using a perturbational approach, whereby the impulse-response properties of cortical neurons are challenged by means of direct activations (22,23). Consistently, TMSevoked EEG events similar to those reported here were previously found in sleeping (25,44,45) and anesthetized (46,47) healthy controls and never in healthy awake subjects (25,28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, due to its activity-dependent nature, cortical bistability and the associated OFF-periods can be better revealed using a perturbational approach, whereby the impulse-response properties of cortical neurons are challenged by means of direct activations (22,23). Consistently, TMSevoked EEG events similar to those reported here were previously found in sleeping (25,44,45) and anesthetized (46,47) healthy controls and never in healthy awake subjects (25,28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…a significant suppression of high frequency (>20 Hz) EEG power compared to baseline (19,20,26) confined to the perilesional stimulated site ( Figure 1B,C and D). Furthermore, we aimed at assessing the effects of local cortical OFF-periods on local signal complexity as measured by the adaptation of a recently proposed index of perturbational complexity (PCI st ; (27)) TMS reveals local, sleep-like cortical OFF-periods over the affected hemisphere only in patients with corticosubcortical lesions irrespective of the etiology In the MCA ischemia group, TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) obtained from the stimulation of the contralesional site were low-amplitude, fast-frequency recurrent scalp waves similar to those previously observed in healthy awake individuals (Figure1B and Figure 2A, red trace; (25,28)). When TMS was applied using the same stimulation parameters over the perilesional site, TEPs were characterized by a local slow EEG potential ( Figure 1B, C and 2A, blue traces) associated with an initial broad-band activation followed by a significant suppression of high frequency EEG power starting roughly at 150 ms after TMS (mean±SEM: 167±14 ms) over the four channels closest to the stimulation site ( Figure 1B and C).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, slow oscillations are a hallmark of pathological unconscious states, found in severely brain injured patients and vegetative state patients . In such patients, dis- ruption of causality and complexity in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation [Rosanova et al, 2018] appears consistent with anesthesia-type slow waves, suggesting adaptation-like mechanisms could play a critical role in impairing information representation. Furthermore, deceleration of slow oscillatory patterns during SWS [Mander et al, 2016, Castano-Prat et al, 2017 and loss of memory [Prinz et al, 1982] are also biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%