1992
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1781(92)90140-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep in spousally bereaved elders with subsyndromal depressive symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
24
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two criteria sets have been proposed for this condition (Horowitz, Siegel, Holen, Bonanno, Milbrath, & Stinson, 1997;Prigerson, Frank, et al, 1995), and neither includes sleep disturbance. Nevertheless, sleep has been found to be disrupted following bereavement (Allaert & Urbinelli, 2004;Hardison et al, 2005;McDermott et al, 1997;Parkes, 1970;Parkes & Brown, 1972;Pasternak et al, 1992;Reynolds et al, 1992;Reynolds et al, 1993), and we have previously documented significant sleep disturbance among individuals participating in this CGT study (Germain et al, 2005). The findings reported here extend these observations to show that CGT responders show statistically significant, albeit modest, sleep improvements posttreatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Two criteria sets have been proposed for this condition (Horowitz, Siegel, Holen, Bonanno, Milbrath, & Stinson, 1997;Prigerson, Frank, et al, 1995), and neither includes sleep disturbance. Nevertheless, sleep has been found to be disrupted following bereavement (Allaert & Urbinelli, 2004;Hardison et al, 2005;McDermott et al, 1997;Parkes, 1970;Parkes & Brown, 1972;Pasternak et al, 1992;Reynolds et al, 1992;Reynolds et al, 1993), and we have previously documented significant sleep disturbance among individuals participating in this CGT study (Germain et al, 2005). The findings reported here extend these observations to show that CGT responders show statistically significant, albeit modest, sleep improvements posttreatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Thus, while the amount of actual sleep obtained by a bereaved senior is indeed related to grief from the loss event, it would appear that by >4 months postloss, the architecture of the sleep stages would seem to be relatively normal. This is in line with the findings of Pasternak et al (1992), who also reported no correlation between PSG sleep stage measures and time since loss in subsyndromally depressed widow(er)s. Such effects have been found, however, when analyses are limited to those formally diagnosed with MDD .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although sleep disturbance is particularly prevalent in the depressed bereaved, even bereaved persons who fail to meet a formal diagnosis of depression have measurable sleep impairment. When a group of spousally bereaved seniors with sub-syndromal symptoms of depression were compared with an age-and gender-matched control group, all of the bereaved subjects scored ≥5 on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), compared to only 4 of the 14 control subjects (Pasternak et al, 1992). More recent, large-scale, epidemiological studies in both Japan (Doi et al, 2000) and Sweden (Valdimarsdottir et al, 2003) have reported that being widowed increases the risk of sleep disorders by up to 90%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies found that sleep quality declined following bereavement, and two found no change. Pasternak et al (1992) found that subjective sleep quality (prolonged sleep latency, daytime dysfunction) was worse among bereaved elders during the first 6 months postloss compared to controls. However, no significant differences in objective measures of sleep (EEG) emerged, except among bereaved elders with subsyndromal depression symptoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The most common instrument used to measure sleep was the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (Buysse et al, 1989), which evaluates sleep quality along seven dimensions (self-reported sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction). Objective estimates of sleep were assessed in several studies by conducting overnight laboratory sleep assessments using polysomnography and electroencephalographic (EEG) evaluations (Anderson, 1999; Pasternak et al, 1992; Reynolds et al, 1992; Reynolds et al, 1993); two studies used actigraphy to monitor rest/activity cycles (Monk et al, 2009; Okun et al, 2011). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%