2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2015.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep disordered breathing and acute mountain sickness in workers rapidly transported to the South Pole (2835m)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was confirmed by a study using PSQI and AIS which reports decreased subjective sleep quality at high altitude, especially reduced general sleep quality and prolonged sleep induction [22]. For workers rapidly transported from sea level to high altitude, there are no statistically significant differences in polysomnographic parameters between subjects with AMS and those without AMS [23]. For people with CMS stationed at Tibet, the proportion of poor sleepers (defined as PSQI > 5) with severe CMS was 12.54-fold higher than that of good sleepers.…”
Section: Sleep Quality and Severity Of Mountain Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This was confirmed by a study using PSQI and AIS which reports decreased subjective sleep quality at high altitude, especially reduced general sleep quality and prolonged sleep induction [22]. For workers rapidly transported from sea level to high altitude, there are no statistically significant differences in polysomnographic parameters between subjects with AMS and those without AMS [23]. For people with CMS stationed at Tibet, the proportion of poor sleepers (defined as PSQI > 5) with severe CMS was 12.54-fold higher than that of good sleepers.…”
Section: Sleep Quality and Severity Of Mountain Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Instead, the observed barometric pressures during 2006 and 2007 of 512.7 ± 1.4 mmHg and 513 ± 4.6 mmHg, respectively, corresponded to equivalent altitudes of 3,197.4 ± 21.4 m (10,490 ft), and 3,183.7 ± 70.1 m (10,445 ft), and a partial pressure of inspired oxygen (PiO 2 ) of 97.6 ± 0.6 hmmHg, which is comparable to an altitude of 3,200 hm (10,500 ft). In fact, due to the unique characteristics of the Antarctic physical environment, the polar conditions may have magnified the risk of AMS when compared to incidence rates at similar altitudes [17,19,30]. Another reason for intensified AMS incidences may be related to false-positive results related to the confounding effects of "altitude-like symptoms" such as travel, change in routine, and anxiety [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies were performed over two summer expeditions to McMurdo Station (sea level) and Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station (high altitude) in 2006 and 2007, and were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota and meet the ethical standards of this journal [15]. Parts of the data generated by the Antarctic Study of Altitude Physiology have been published elsewhere [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study reports data on 38 healthy 25-37-year-old, not acclimatized, individuals after a 3-hour flight from sea level to a South Pole research station at an altitude of 2835 m (Anderson et al, 2015). Acute mountain sickness (AMS) was assessed over the first 3 days, defining AMS as a Lake Louise score > 2 with headache.…”
Section: Sleep-disordered Breathing In Healthy Individuals At Moderatmentioning
confidence: 99%