Sleep deprivation adversely affects interpersonal responses to frustration

Kahn-Greene, Ellen T.; Lipizzi, Erica L.; Conrad, Amy K.; Kamimori, Gary H.; Killgore, William D. S.

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.002

Cited by 176 publications

(135 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

122

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fifty-five hours of sleep loss induced intense frustration and aggression, deterioration in interpersonal relations [120], as well as an increase in the subjective perception of affective symptoms of psychopathology (anxiety, depression, mania, insanity) [121]. Survey studies conducted on male teenagers revealed a correlation between sleep deficiency and elevated aggression [122].…”

Section: Changes In Eeg Signalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While long-lasting and monotonous driving makes the visual field more narrow, intense drowsiness causes deficits within the whole field [61]. Sleep restriction increases the rate of risky behaviour, due to impaired ability to assess a situation [152], and of aggressive behaviour as well [120]. Prolonged microepisodes of sleep during driving considerably reduce the driving safety [59].…”

Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Consequences of sleep deprivation

Orzeł-Gryglewska¹

2010

International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health

211

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the history of research and the results of recent studies on the effects of sleep deprivation in animals and humans. Humans can bear several days of continuous sleeplessness, experiencing deterioration in wellbeing and effectiveness; however, also a shorter reduction in the sleep time may lead to deteriorated functioning. Sleeplessness accounts for impaired perception, difficulties in keeping concentration, vision disturbances, slower reactions, as well as the appearance of microepisodes of sleep during wakefulness which lead to lower capabilities and efficiency of task performance and to increased number of errors. Sleep deprivation results in poor memorizing, schematic thinking, which yields wrong decisions, and emotional disturbances such as deteriorated interpersonal responses and increased aggressiveness. The symptoms are accompanied by brain tissue hypometabolism, particularly in the thalamus, prefrontal, frontal and occipital cortex and motor speech centres. Sleep deficiency intensifies muscle tonus and coexisting tremor, speech performance becomes monotonous and unclear, and sensitivity to pain is higher. Sleeplessness also relates to the changes in the immune response and the pattern of hormonal secretion, of the growth hormone in particular. The risk of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease increases. The impairment of performance which is caused by 20-25 hours of sleeplessness is comparable to that after ethanol intoxication at the level of 0.10% blood alcohol concentration. The consequences of chronic sleep reduction or a shallow sleep repeated for several days tend to accumulate and resemble the effects of acute sleep deprivation lasting several dozen hours. At work, such effects hinder proper performance of many essential tasks and in extreme situations (machine operation or vehicle driving), sleep loss may be hazardous to the worker and his/her environment.

show abstract

Section: Changes In Eeg Signalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consequences of sleep deprivation

Orzeł-Gryglewska¹

2010

International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health

211

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Of course it is also possible that poor sleep adversely affects relationships. Indeed, evidence suggests that sleep deprivation has adverse effects on interpersonal and emotional responsiveness (Kahn-Greene et al 2006), which may directly affect the way in which one interacts with their partner.…”

Section: Specific Nonshared Environmental Influence: Relationship Satmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nonshared Environmental Influences on Sleep Quality: A Study of Monozygotic Twin Differences

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research has consistently demonstrated that environmental influences are important for explaining the variability in sleep quality observed in the general population. Although there is substantial evidence assessing associations between sleep quality and a host of environmental variables, it is possible that their effects are mediated by genetic influence. A monozygotic twin differences design was used to assess the specific contribution of nonshared environmental influences on sleep quality, whilst controlling for genetic and shared environmental effects in a sample of 380 monozygotic twins (mean age 19.8 years, SD=1.26, range=18-22 years). Participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and questionnaires assessing several candidate "environmental" measures. When controlling for genetic and shared environmental effects, within monozygotic twin-pair differences in sleep quality were associated with within monozygotic twin-pair differences in general health for males (β=1.56, p<.001) and relationship satisfaction for females (β=1.01, p<.05). For the remaining environmental measures the results suggest that these seemingly "environmental" influences are actually in part dependent on genetics and/or the shared environment. These findings give insight into how specific environments affect sleep and the possible mechanisms behind these associations.

show abstract

“…Repeated measures ANOVA showed a main effect of time of testing, F (1,49) = 5.05, P = 0.029, a significant drug effect, F (3,49) = 12.77, P < 0.0001, and drug by time of testing interaction, F (3,49) = 4.45, P = 0.008. As evident in Figure 2, Bonferroni post hoc comparisons showed that this interaction was produced by a significant (P ≤ 0.001) worsening of the PVT speed performance (as a % of baseline) for the placebo group, whereas none of the 3 stimulant groups showed significant changes from the beginning to the end of the executive function testing block.…”

Section: Results Psychomotor Vigilancementioning

confidence: 96%

“…Participants were allowed to sleep at 20:00 Saturday evening (Day 3) until 08:00 the placebo group (P < 0.01). Interestingly, there was no significant difference among the groups with regard to the average pick-up time for each ring, F (3,38) = 0.93, P = 0.963, suggesting that these effects were not due simply to faster processing or motor speed. When the TOH was re-administered following a full night of recovery sleep, no drug group differences were apparent for total moves or for average pick-up times.…”

Section: Subjective Sleepinessmentioning

confidence: 90%

Sustaining Executive Functions During Sleep Deprivation: A Comparison of Caffeine, Dextroamphetamine, and Modafinil

2009

Sleep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sleep deprivation adversely affects interpersonal responses to frustration

Cited by 176 publications

References 24 publications

Consequences of sleep deprivation

Consequences of sleep deprivation

Nonshared Environmental Influences on Sleep Quality: A Study of Monozygotic Twin Differences

Sustaining Executive Functions During Sleep Deprivation: A Comparison of Caffeine, Dextroamphetamine, and Modafinil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About