Objectives:
Current risk assessment tools can predict problematic behavior and the need for coercive measures, but only with a moderate level of accuracy. The aim of this study was to assess antecedents and triggers of seclusion.
Methods:
Narrative notes of health care professionals on psychiatric inpatients were analyzed daily starting 3 days prior to seclusion in the case group (
n
= 26) and compared to a matched control group without seclusion (
n
= 26) by use of quantitative and qualitative research methods, based on qualitative content analysis.
Results:
Quantitative measures showed more aggression in the case group with highly significant differences between the groups (
p
< 0.001) at all measurement times. Seclusion was significantly associated with the total word count of the narrative notes. Subjective emotional expressions by staff were more apparent before seclusion (
p
= 0.003). Most frequently, subjective expressions regarding “arduous/provocative” (
p
< 0.001) and “anxious” (
p
= 0.010) sentiments could be identified in the case group. Description of patients' behavior in the case group included more negatively assessed terms (
p
= 0.001). Moreover, sleep loss, refusing medication, high contact frequency, demanding behavior and denied requests were present in a significantly higher frequency before seclusion. Expressions like “threatening” (
p
= 0.001) were found only before seclusion and appeared to have the function of personal risk assessment. The expression “manageable” (
p
= 0.035) appeared often in difficult situations that could still be handled.
Conclusion:
Several factors preceding seclusion could be identified. Narrative notes of staff already showed differences 3 days before the escalation. Particularly the word count, the analysis of terms describing patients' behavior, subjective expressions of staff, and terms used as a function of personal risk assessment could help to provide better predictions of aggressive incidents and to prevent coercive measures.