Emancipation and the Remaking of the British Imperial World 2014
DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719091834.003.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slavery, the slave trade and economic growth: a contribution to the debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 In England and Wales 35 Inikori (2002;314-61); Hudson (2021). 36 Hudson (2014); Hudson (2021); Rönnbäck (2014). 37 Inikori (2002: 362-404); Hudson (1989).…”
Section: Atlantic Ports and Their Economic Hinterlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 In England and Wales 35 Inikori (2002;314-61); Hudson (2021). 36 Hudson (2014); Hudson (2021); Rönnbäck (2014). 37 Inikori (2002: 362-404); Hudson (1989).…”
Section: Atlantic Ports and Their Economic Hinterlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assist in such a task, Hudson proposes a methodology that examines the fortunes of planters themselves, the dispersal of their fortunes and their connections with creditors. 95 The available documentary evidence associated with the planting career of John Lamont allows the first two aspects of the Hudson methodology to be implemented here (as there seems to be no surviving records from Lamont's sugar plantations in the colonial period).…”
Section: A Fortune Accumulated By the 'Strictest Integrity'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They ignored the unregistered slave smuggling and the indirect Atlantic trade through Spanish and Portuguese ports. Wallerstein (1989), Inikori (2002, Findlay & Rourke (2007), Maddison (2007), Hudson (2014) and Draper (2014) criticize the minimizing of the importance of the slave trade, the plantation production of cotton and sugar by slaves, and overseas markets in Africa and the Americas for the British Industrial Revolution in order to perpetuate the myth that Europe reached its temporary global superiority by its own efforts, backed by presumed superior bourgeois values, and not by the exploitation of others. They developed a more complex model than that of Williams according to which British manufacturing, American agriculture and the African slave trade were deeply intertwined and the highest share of American export commodities (over 80%) was…”
Section: Historical Background: Atlantic Slavery Capitalism and The mentioning
confidence: 99%