SLAP: Succinct and Lightweight Authentication Protocol for low-cost RFID system

Luo, Hanguang; Wen, Guangjun; Su, Jian; Huang, Zhong

doi:10.1007/s11276-016-1323-y

Cited by 57 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on the initial object-finding request, the SecureFind scheme can obtain the information the service provider. Based on the vulnerability of two published protocols RRAP [202] and RCIA [203], Luo et al [204] proposed recently a new ultra-lightweight mutual authentication protocol, which doesn't use any unbalanced operations like OR and AND.…”

Section: Rfid Authentication With Privacymentioning

confidence: 99%

Security for 4G and 5G cellular networks: A survey of existing authentication and privacy-preserving schemes

Ferrag

Μαγλαράς

Argyriou

et al. 2018

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

218

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-This paper presents a comprehensive survey of existing authentication and privacy-preserving schemes for 4G and 5G cellular networks. We start by providing an overview of existing surveys that deal with 4G and 5G communications, applications, standardization, and security. Then, we give a classification of threat models in 4G and 5G cellular networks in four categories, including, attacks against privacy, attacks against integrity, attacks against availability, and attacks against authentication. We also provide a classification of countermeasures into three types of categories, including, cryptography methods, humans factors, and intrusion detection methods. The countermeasures and informal and formal security analysis techniques used by the authentication and privacy preserving schemes are summarized in form of tables. Based on the categorization of the authentication and privacy models, we classify these schemes in seven types, including, handover authentication with privacy, mutual authentication with privacy, RFID authentication with privacy, deniable authentication with privacy, authentication with mutual anonymity, authentication and key agreement with privacy, and three-factor authentication with privacy. In addition, we provide a taxonomy and comparison of authentication and privacypreserving schemes for 4G and 5G cellular networks in form of tables. Based on the current survey, several recommendations for further research are discussed at the end of this paper.

show abstract

Section: Rfid Authentication With Privacymentioning

confidence: 99%

Security for 4G and 5G cellular networks: A survey of existing authentication and privacy-preserving schemes

Ferrag

Μαγλαράς

Argyriou

et al. 2018

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

218

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are many hybrid nontriangular UMAPs available in the literature. In this subsection, the protocols under consideration are RFID Authentication Protocol with Permutation (RAPP) [4], RFID Authentication Protocol for Low cost Tags (RAPLT) [40], Robust Confidentiality Integrity and Authentication (RCIA) protocol [41], and Succinct and Lightweight Authentication Protocol (SLAP) [30].…”

Section: Umaps With Hybrid Nontriangular Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultralightweight RFID Authentication Protocols for Low-Cost Passive RFID Tags

Khalid

Mujahid

Najam-ul-Islam

2019

Security and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of pervasive computing especially the Internet of Things (IoT) network is evolving due to high network speed and increased capacity offered by the 5G communication system. The IoT network identifies each device before giving it access to the network. The RFID system is one of the most prominent enabling technologies for the node identification. Since the communication between the node and the network takes place over an insecure wireless channel, an authentication mechanism is required to avoid the malicious devices from entering the network. This paper presents a brief survey on the authentication protocols along with the prominent cryptanalysis models for the EPC C1G2 RFID systems. A comparative analysis is provided to highlight the common weaknesses of the existing authentication algorithms and to emphasize on the lack of security standardization for the resource constraint IoT network perception layer. This paper is concluded by proposing an ultralightweight protocol that provides Extremely Good Privacy (EGP). The proposed EGP protocol avoids all the pitfalls highlighted by the cryptanalysis of the existing authentication protocols. The incorporation of the novel ultralightweight primitives, Per-XOR ( ) and Inverse Per-XOR ( −1 ), makes the protocol messages more robust and irreversible for all types of adversaries. A comprehensive security analysis illustrates that the proposed protocol proves to be highly resistive against all possible attack scenarios and ensures the security optimally.Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) system is emerging as an enabling technology for the node discovery due to the features such as high speed, long range, and nonline of sight scanning [4]. The RFID enabled IoT networks are being preferred in various surveillance, monitoring, and healthcare applications. Table 1 highlights some of the prominent applications reported in the literature.The architecture of the RFID enabled IoT network is composed of three components: the RFID system, the IoT middleware, and the Internet [15]. The RFID system facilitates the node identification and the data collection. The data gathered from the environment under observation is processed by the IoT middleware. The IoT middleware also acts as a gateway to the external Internet [16].The architecture of the RFID system embedded in an IoT network consists of three main components; the Electronic Product Code (EPC) tag, the reader, and the database. The tag is a low-cost electronic chip with the unique identification number ( ). The reader identifies each tag associated with

show abstract

“…In this section, we propose an enhancement to the GAMTP (referred to as E-GAMTP) to overcome the vulnerabilities shown in the previous section. This enhancement is based on employing the conversion operation [34]. This is a stronger cryptographic bitwise function to resist the attack while, at the same time, avoiding addition of a high level of computational and power expensive operations.…”

Section: Enhanced Gamtp (E-gamtp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

An Enhanced and Resource-Aware RFID Multitag Grouping Protocol

Dhailah

Taqieddin

Alma'aitah

2019

Security and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several grouping proof protocols were presented to meet the security requirements of Radio Frequency Identification Systems. Nevertheless, these protocols were shown to be vulnerable to various attacks. In this work, we cryptanalyze one of the newest grouping proof protocols. Through this analysis, we show the weaknesses of the protocol and launch a full-disclosure attack to disclose all secrets in the protocol. We show that the probability of success of the protocol is one and that increasing the length of the strings adds little complexity to the attack. We follow this by proposing an enhanced version of the protocol with better overall security. We show its efficiency by providing a security and performance analysis and comparing it with some of the existing protocols in the literature.

show abstract

SLAP: Succinct and Lightweight Authentication Protocol for low-cost RFID system

Cited by 57 publications

References 25 publications

Security for 4G and 5G cellular networks: A survey of existing authentication and privacy-preserving schemes

Security for 4G and 5G cellular networks: A survey of existing authentication and privacy-preserving schemes

Ultralightweight RFID Authentication Protocols for Low-Cost Passive RFID Tags

An Enhanced and Resource-Aware RFID Multitag Grouping Protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About