2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2020-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SLALOM, a flexible method for the identification and statistical analysis of overlapping continuous sequence elements in sequence- and time-series data

Abstract: BackgroundProtein or nucleic acid sequences contain a multitude of associated annotations representing continuous sequence elements (CSEs). Comparing these CSEs is needed, whenever we want to match identical annotations or integrate distinctive ones. Currently, there is no ready-to-use software available that provides comprehensive statistical readout for comparing two annotations of the same type with each other, which can be adapted to the application logic of the scientific question.ResultsWe have developed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation of mined motifs can be also subjective. Since the extracted motifs do not always exactly match the experimental motifs, residue-level or site-level evaluations have been proposed 26,32 . Despite great efforts in this area, computational motif mining has remained a challenging task and the state-of-the-art de novo approaches have reported relatively low precision and recall scores, especially at the residue level 26 .…”
Section: Motif Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of mined motifs can be also subjective. Since the extracted motifs do not always exactly match the experimental motifs, residue-level or site-level evaluations have been proposed 26,32 . Despite great efforts in this area, computational motif mining has remained a challenging task and the state-of-the-art de novo approaches have reported relatively low precision and recall scores, especially at the residue level 26 .…”
Section: Motif Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of mined motifs can be also subjective. Since the extracted motifs do not always exactly match the experimental motifs, residue-level or site-level evaluations have been proposed [26,32]. Despite great efforts in this area, computational motif mining has remained a challenging task and the state-of-the-art de novo approaches have reported relatively low precision and recall scores, even at the residue level [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%