1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf02653963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slag movement in ESR of steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of CO bubbles on bath stirring was considered negligible because they only affect the immediate vicinity of the electrodes. Velocities calculated in the present work was marginally higher than in other similar studies, the latter ranging from 0.03 to 0.43 m/s [6,7,10,11,27,28,31,35,36] . This may be attributed to lower slag viscosity values in this study ( Table 1 ) compared to the literature.…”
Section: Velocitycontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of CO bubbles on bath stirring was considered negligible because they only affect the immediate vicinity of the electrodes. Velocities calculated in the present work was marginally higher than in other similar studies, the latter ranging from 0.03 to 0.43 m/s [6,7,10,11,27,28,31,35,36] . This may be attributed to lower slag viscosity values in this study ( Table 1 ) compared to the literature.…”
Section: Velocitycontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Stirring of the melt takes place, mainly by buoyancy due to the high temperature gradients within the slag [5][6][7][8][9] ; additional weak stirring occurs by electromagnetic Lorentz-type forces and carbon monoxide bubbles which are continuously released from the Söderberg electrodes [5,10] . The contribution of carbon monoxide bubbles to stirring of the bath is ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, transport properties affect the maximum temperatures achieved, the temporal distribution of liquid fraction and the formation of stirring velocity gradients in the slag melt. Buoyancy effects are the main contributors to slag stirring [7]; however, marginal contributions also exist, due to electromagnetic (Lorentz) forces and rising CO bubbles emitted from electrode surfaces upon their reduction by oxygen present in the slag mixed-oxide phases [6,7,[10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from Li et al, [14] both laboratory scale and industrial size, demonstrate the strong effects of fill ratio (0.24 and 0.6) and electrical conductivity on the specific energy consumption with values below 1000 kWh t À1 at higher fill ratios combined with low or no CaF 2 -containing slags. CaF 2 -free slags in Brückmann and Schwerdtfeger [17] confirmed their particular advantage in specific energy consumption with values below 1000 kWh t À1 .There are only few reports of systematic research on energy consumption in ESR on the industrial scale. A recent investigation with a wider variation of slags is documented in refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[9] A comparison after remelting using a slag of 40% CaF 2 , 30% CaO, and 30% Al 2 O 3 with CaF 2 -free slags shows that, except for higher SiO 2 concentrations, good levels in cleanliness can also be achieved by all slags. [17] However, the investigated steel had a relatively high S content, hence improvements regarding cleanliness were dominantly connected with sulfur removal, which is not directly comparable with modern steelmaking praxis. Contrarily, according to Anable et al, [19] CaF 2 -free slags led to a limited cleaning effect compared to CaF 2 -rich ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%