2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2001)127:3(230)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slab Effects in SMRF Retrofit Connection Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This beneficial effect of the slab comes from the lateral support and the delaying of local buckling due toe presence of the slab. In fact, according to the references (Civjan et al, [7,8]), the bare steel connections showed some lateral instabilities during the loading stage, probably due to the poor test setup. Nevertheless, since no actual building has bare steel frame alone, this effect is taken for granted.…”
Section: Composite Connection Test: Us Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This beneficial effect of the slab comes from the lateral support and the delaying of local buckling due toe presence of the slab. In fact, according to the references (Civjan et al, [7,8]), the bare steel connections showed some lateral instabilities during the loading stage, probably due to the poor test setup. Nevertheless, since no actual building has bare steel frame alone, this effect is taken for granted.…”
Section: Composite Connection Test: Us Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The tests performed by Civjan et al are modeled (Civjan et al, [7,8]). The original purpose of the test was to find an effective and economic repair method for existing connections.…”
Section: Composite Connection Test: Us Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Civjan et al [7] tested six specimens under reversed cyclic loading, three of which were composite slab specimens. The main conclusion was that the slab compressive zone at the column flange was wider than the column face, and distributed at approximately 15°to 30°from the column considering the crack patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%