2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SkyMapper stellar parameters for Galactic Archaeology on a grand-scale

Abstract: The SkyMapper photometric surveys provides uvgriz photometry for several millions sources in the Southern sky. We use DR1.1 to explore the quality of its photometry, and develop a formalism to homogenise zero-points across the sky using stellar effective temperatures. Physical flux transformations, and zero-points appropriate for this release are derived, along with relations linking colour indices to stellar parameters. Reddening-free pseudo-colours and pseudo-magnitudes are also introduced. For late-type sta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(94 reference statements)
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With GALAH DR3 on the horizon the SkyMapper team is set to update their calibration; however, we do not need to wait for this to undertake the current investigation, as by looking at the Gaia colors and magnitudes and using the knowledge about metallicities from the RGB as a prior to our investigation, we can circumnavigate this particular problem. The SkyMapper magnitudes have been corrected for reddening using rescaled E(B − V ) from the Schlegel et al (1998) map as described by Casagrande et al (2019). We use these same E(B − V ) estimates, combined with the mean extinction coefficients given by Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018, Table 2), to correct the Gaia magnitudes for reddening.…”
Section: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With GALAH DR3 on the horizon the SkyMapper team is set to update their calibration; however, we do not need to wait for this to undertake the current investigation, as by looking at the Gaia colors and magnitudes and using the knowledge about metallicities from the RGB as a prior to our investigation, we can circumnavigate this particular problem. The SkyMapper magnitudes have been corrected for reddening using rescaled E(B − V ) from the Schlegel et al (1998) map as described by Casagrande et al (2019). We use these same E(B − V ) estimates, combined with the mean extinction coefficients given by Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018, Table 2), to correct the Gaia magnitudes for reddening.…”
Section: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caffau et al 2013;Aoki et al 2013;Allende Prieto et al 2015;Aguado et al 2016;Li et al 2015;Aguado et al 2017aAguado et al ,b, 2018a, mostly with the help of large spectroscopic surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS, York et al 2000), the Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration (SEGUE, Yanny et al 2009), the Baryonic Oscillations Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS, Eisenstein et al 2011;Dawson et al 2013), and more recently the large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST, Deng et al 2012). More targeted searches have also been in use for many years, from early efforts using a Ca H & K objective-prism technique, such as the HK survey (Beers et al 1985(Beers et al , 1992 and the Hamburg ESO survey (Christlieb et al 2002), to more recent efforts using targeted narow/medium-band photometry at blue wavelengths, like the SkyMapper survey (Keller et al 2007;Wolf et al 2018;Casagrande et al 2019;Huang et al 2019), and the Pristine survey (Starkenburg et al 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shows. This is potentially true, but the photometric distribution has greater scatter compared to the RAVE and APOGEE survey metallicities (see Casagrande et al 2019). This is demonstrated by the extension to unlikely metallicities of > 0.5 dex for K2 SM.…”
Section: Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To supplement this information, photometric values of T eff and [Fe/H] determined from observations by the SkyMapper survey (Keller et al 2007;Wolf et al 2018) have been used. SkyMapper is designed to take uvgriz photometry, from which stellar parameters can be derived (Casagrande et al 2019). The reported survey parameters have been calibrated using GALAH (Buder et al 2018) spectroscopic metallicities and T eff from the InfraRed Flux Method, and validated against APOGEE DR14 (Abolfathi et al 2018) and RAVE DR5 to ensure reliable parameter determinations.…”
Section: Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%