Skull and Facial Bone Trauma

Allsop, Douglas “L”; Kennett, Kelly

doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21787-1_12

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The present results also agree well with the dynamic impact study of Got et al [31] in 1978 using helmeted cadavers, which reported that head accelerations were 50% higher in frontal impacts than lateral impacts. However, this does not infer that frontal impact is more severe than lateral impact as the tolerance limit is lower for lateral impact than frontal impact [32].…”

Section: High Speed Camera Photographymentioning

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Performance of an advanced combat helmet with different interior cushioning systems in ballistic impact: Experiments and finite element simulations

Tan

Tse

Lee

et al. 2012

International Journal of Impact Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: High Speed Camera Photographymentioning

confidence: 93%

“…For lateral ballistic impact, the peak acceleration values of both helmets are observed to be within the WSTC and FMVSS 218 limits. However, it shall be noted that the human tolerance for lateral impacts is lower than that of frontal impacts even though lower G is experienced from side impacts [32].…”

Section: Comparison With Injury Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance of an advanced combat helmet with different interior cushioning systems in ballistic impact: Experiments and finite element simulations

Tan

Tse

Lee

et al. 2012

International Journal of Impact Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…1,9 Rarely panfacial trauma resembling life threatening condition; however, it is almost associated with dangerous sequala, such as airway obstruction. 10,11 Many complications could associate the reconstruction of panfacial fractures Malocclusion can be managed with, orthodontic treatment or orthognathic surgery. Anesthesia of the face could happen due to nerve damage and mostly improve conservatively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenge and management outcome of panfacial fractures in Sohag University hospital, Egypt

Abdelrahman¹,

Abdelmaaboud²,

Hamody³

2017

Int Surg J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: panfacial fractures resembles a therapeutic challenge to maxillofacial surgeons This study was carried out to determine the etiology, injury characteristics and management outcome of pan facial fractures at Sohag university hospital.Methods: A retrospective hospital based study of panfacial fractures patients was carried out at Sohag university hospital from January 2010 to December 2016. Data was collected and analyzed using SPPS.Results: 200 Panfacial Trauma Patients were analysed. Males to females by a ratio of 24:1. Their ages ranged from 13 to 63 years with a mean of 30±12 years Most injuries were due to road traffic accidents (78%), and by falling from height in 12%. Mandibular fractures were the most common type of injuries. Open reduction and internal fixation by using plates and screws was the commonest surgical technique, used in 97.8% of cases. The most common complications were limited mouth opening, malocclusion. The mean duration of hospital stay was 11.13±2.23 days.Conclusions: Road traffic accident (RTC) was the most common cause of panfacial injuries in our locality and the young adult males were the most commonly affected victims. The majority of maxillofacial fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation.

show abstract

“…For restrained vehicle occupants, injuries to the head and thorax are primary sources of morbidity and mortality occurring from motor vehicle accidents (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) . While increased seat belt usage and advances in restraint design have, on average, substantially improved the injury outcome for restrained occupants, numerous fatalities and debilitating injuries are still occurring nonetheless (6) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Methodology for Assessing Intrasegmental Kinematics of the Whole Human Spine during Impacts

Lessley

Shaw

Joseph

et al. 2014

IJAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluating the biofidelity of spinal response in ATDs and computational models requires additional benchmarking data. The current study presents a kinematic analysis methodology for obtaining intrasegmental kinematics of the spine including elongation, compression, displacement, and anatomical rotations of the spine including flexion, lateral flexion, and rotation. The presented methodology divides the spine into five spine segments selected for detailed kinematic analysis which were specifically the following: head-to-T1, T1-to-T8, T8-to-L2, L2-to-L4, and L4-to-pelvis. The methodology provides a technique to more comprehensively describe the kinematics of the whole human spine than has been performed to date in the impact environment.

show abstract

Skull and Facial Bone Trauma

Cited by 8 publications

References 22 publications

Performance of an advanced combat helmet with different interior cushioning systems in ballistic impact: Experiments and finite element simulations

Performance of an advanced combat helmet with different interior cushioning systems in ballistic impact: Experiments and finite element simulations

Challenge and management outcome of panfacial fractures in Sohag University hospital, Egypt

A Methodology for Assessing Intrasegmental Kinematics of the Whole Human Spine during Impacts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About