Skipping breakfast among 8-9 year old children is associated with teacher-reported but not objectively measured academic performance two years later

Abstract

Background: Skipping breakfast, habitually and when experimentally manipulated, has been linked in the shortterm to poorer academic performance in children. Little is known about the longer-term effects. This study examined whether skipping breakfast at aged 8-9 years predicted poorer academic performance and classroom behavior 2 years later. Methods: The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) collected data during 2008 (aged 8-9 years) and 2010 (aged 10-11 years). Breakfast consumption was reported by a parent/caregiver on three occasions within 4 weeks during 2008: by face-to-face interview and two subsequent questionnaires. Children who skipped breakfast on at least one of the 3 days were classified as breakfast skippers. During 2010, the child's teacher assessed their academic performance relative to other children in the same grade (below/far below average; average; above/far above average) and classroom behavior. Objective literacy and numeracy outcomes (reading, writing, spelling, grammar and numeracy, score range 0-1000) were obtained via linkage to Australian standardized national assessment program (NAPLAN) data in Year 5 (aged 10-11 years). Ordinal and linear regression were used, adjusted for sex, age and sociodemographic variables. Results: At baseline, 243 (10.7%) of the 2280 children skipped breakfast on at least 1 day. Two years later, breakfast skippers were more likely to have poorer teacher-reported reading (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.29), mathematics (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.20) and overall academic achievement (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25) than non-skippers. In contrast, differences in objective NAPLAN scores were small (<3%), and only one of the five scales (numeracy) was significantly lower among skippers (mean difference − 13.0; 95% CI: -25.6, −0.8). Classroom behavior was similar between skippers and non-skippers. Conclusion: In this national sample of 8-9 year old Australian children, skipping breakfast occurred at low levels, and showed little association with measured academic performance 2 years later. This contrasted with teacher perceptions of lower academic performance among skippers than non-skippers, most likely reflecting confounding. This underscores the importance of using objective measures of academic performance to avoid inflated effect estimates and, potentially, unnecessary and costly population interventions to increase breakfast consumption.

School Breakfast Club Programs in Australian Primary Schools, Not Just Addressing Food Insecurity: A Qualitative Study

“…The provision of breakfast at school is designed explicitly to address the negative consequences of arriving at school hungry and support the health and well-being of children. As has been found in previous studies, adult participants identified improved concentration, classroom behavior, and academic outcomes of students who attended (Smith, Blizzard, et al, 2017). However, this study found that children did not eat breakfast at home for a variety of reasons, not all of them related to poverty or food insecurity.…”

The “Motor of the Day”: Parent and School-Age Children’s Cognitions, Barriers, and Supports for Breakfast

“…Children who regularly eat breakfast perform better academically than children who skip breakfast [19,20]. Children who consume a nutritious breakfast score higher in literacy tests than those who skip breakfast [21].…”

Under nutrition as a predictor of poor academic performance; the case of Nekemte primary schools students, Western Ethiopia

“…Children who didn’t skip their breakfast were 2 times more likely to have good academic score. The longitudinal study conducted among Australian children also revealed that over all academic achievement were higher in breakfast non-skippers than breakfast skippers [19]. A cross sectional study conducted in southern Ethiopia also shown that habit of skipping breakfast affected the cognitive performance of early adolescents [20].…”