2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2022.102983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skinny as a Bird: Design fiction as a vehicle for reflecting on food futures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the latter are extensively used within certain approaches to SRT, critical approaches (see Castro & Batel, 2008) also favour qualitative methodologies. We do not, therefore, see any incommensurability between the two perspectives when it comes to the question of how people represent the future: these analyses can surely be performed by using the methods that more critical approaches to SRT have been using to explore SRs – focus groups, individual interviews, media and policy analyses – but it also opens up the opportunity to combine those methods with other techniques and tools that have been prevalent in PS, such as participant observation, case studies and those flourishing in other fields and which are particularly helpful in exploring meaning‐making about the future, such as material methods (Ravn, 2022) and design fiction (Hebrok & Mainsah, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the latter are extensively used within certain approaches to SRT, critical approaches (see Castro & Batel, 2008) also favour qualitative methodologies. We do not, therefore, see any incommensurability between the two perspectives when it comes to the question of how people represent the future: these analyses can surely be performed by using the methods that more critical approaches to SRT have been using to explore SRs – focus groups, individual interviews, media and policy analyses – but it also opens up the opportunity to combine those methods with other techniques and tools that have been prevalent in PS, such as participant observation, case studies and those flourishing in other fields and which are particularly helpful in exploring meaning‐making about the future, such as material methods (Ravn, 2022) and design fiction (Hebrok & Mainsah, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in workshops there is little time for explicitly documenting the ideas behind such interventions. Inspired by Hebrok & Mainsah [6] who used purposely designed fake news in their design fiction project BIRD, we found that asking students to articulate such ideas using fake news reports serves this goal of clarifying intentions behind their interventions surprisingly well. For students this proved to be an inspiring and fast way to articulate their ideas behind the concept, and during the final exhibition, many visitors reacted positively, stating that the fake news reports made it easy to understand the speculative and norm-critical designs displayed.…”
Section: Fake News Reportsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Partly inspired by acknowledgement that conventional user-centred design methods may not provide a full picture, designers have in the past decade stepped away from solely using conventional product and service design, and more recently explored approaches including design futuring, design fiction (Hebrok & Mainsah, 2022), design activism (Julier, 2013), speculative design (Dunne & Raby, 2013), (norm-) critical design, and norm-creative design. (But how to see narratives explicitly as both an element of the toolbox and/or as part of solution spaces is still ill-explored.…”
Section: Less Conventional Approaches Towards User Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%