Skin self-examinations and visual identification of atypical nevi: Comparing individual and crowdsourcing approaches

Abstract

Purpose Skin self-examination (SSE) is one method for identifying atypical nevi among members of the general public. Unfortunately, past research has shown that SSE has low sensitivity in detecting atypical nevi. The current study investigates whether crowdsourcing (collective effort) can improve SSE identification accuracy. Collective effort is potentially useful for improving people’s visual identification of atypical nevi during SSE because, even when a single person has low reliability at a task, the pattern of the group can overcome the limitations of each individual. Methods Adults (N = 500) were recruited from a shopping mall in the Midwest. Participants viewed educational pamphlets about SSE and then completed a mole identification task. For the task, participants were asked to circle mole images that appeared atypical. Forty nevi images were provided; nine of the images were of nevi that were later diagnosed as melanoma. Results Consistent with past research, individual effort exhibited modest sensitivity (.58) for identifying atypical nevi in the mole identification task. As predicted, collective effort overcame the limitations of individual effort. Specifically, a 19% collective effort identification threshold exhibited superior sensitivity (.90). Conclusions The results of the current study suggest that limitations of SSE can be countered by collective effort, a finding that supports the pursuit of interventions promoting early melanoma detection that contain crowdsourcing visual identification components.

Use of Mobile Devices, Social Media, and Crowdsourcing as Digital Strategies to Improve Emergency Cardiovascular Care

“…Crowdsourcing represents a collective effort of problem solving to answer a challenge. [157][158][159] It allows for a participatory culture that can harness the collective intelligence of the masses on an open platform. 30 Social media has enhanced crowdsourcing, allowing individuals and groups to reach other individuals or groups in real time and in large numbers.…”

Redesigning Skin Cancer Early Detection and Care Using a New Mobile Health Application: Protocol of the SKIN Research Project, a Randomised Controlled Trial

“…Expecting a participant drop-out of 5% based on our previous studies [18, 26], a sample size of 110 at analyses in each group will provide more than 80% power to detect an improvement in sensitivity by 20% or greater [33]. Such improvement is clinically relevant and within the maximum achieved in previous studies that investigated SSE aids [9, 10]. …”

“…Current SSE guidelines also do not differ depending on whether a person has few or many moles; thus, reports on the sensitivity of SSE vary widely, from 25 to 93% [9, 10]. Most studies contributing to the evidence for SSE are small, use a non-randomised pre-post study design or test accuracy of detecting change in skin lesions which are artificially enlarged [9].…”

The application of crowdsourcing approaches to cancer research: a systematic review

“…The largest single type of cancer represented among these 12 studies was breast cancer, which was the focus of four (33%) of the studies reviewed . Cancers of focus among six of the studies comprised skin , ovarian , cervical , colorectal , and prostate . Of the remaining two studies, one used three simulated tumors with varying levels of cellular complexity and genetic mutation , while the other addressed the use of crowdsourcing for survivorship care planning following cancer .…”