Skin Quality – A Holistic 360° View: Consensus Results

Abstract

Introduction Skin quality is an important component of human attractiveness. To date, there are no standardized criteria for good skin quality. To establish a consensus for good skin quality parameters and measurement and treatment options, a virtual skin quality advisory board consisting of a global panel of highly experienced aesthetic dermatologists/aesthetic physicians was convened. Methods A total of 10 dermatologists/aesthetic physicians served on the advisory board. A modified version of the Delphi method was used to arrive at consensus. Members accessed an online platform to review statements on skin quality criteria from their peers, including treatment and measurement options, and voted to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed. Statements that did not have agreement were modified and the members voted again. Consensus was defined as: strong consensus = greater than 95% agreement; consensus = 75% to 95% agreement; majority consent = 50% to 75% agreement; no consensus = less than 50% agreement. Results There was strong consensus that good skin quality is defined as healthy, youthful in appearance (appearing younger than a person’s chronological age), undamaged skin and that skin quality can be described across all ethnicities by four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): skin tone evenness, skin surface evenness, skin firmness, and skin glow. The EPCs can be affected by multiple tissue layers (ie, skin surface quality can stem from and be impacted by deep structures or tissues). This means that topical approaches may not be sufficient. Instead, improving skin quality EPCs can require a multilayer treatment strategy. Conclusion This global advisory board established strong consensus that skin quality can be described by four EPCs, which can help clinicians determine the appropriate treatment option(s) and the tissue or skin layer(s) to address. Skin quality is important to human health and wellbeing and patients’ perception for the need for aesthetic treatment.

From Anatomical Modifications to Skin Quality: Case Series of Botulinum Toxin and Facial Fillers for Facial Feminization in Transgender Women

“…The process of feminization must include not only anatomical modifications but also skin quality assessment, since skin features are also important for gender perception. Skin quality significantly influences perception of age, attractiveness, health and youth 17 . Good skin quality is defined as healthy, undamaged, youthful in appearance, and it can be described across all ethnicities by four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): skin tone evenness, skin surface evenness, skin firmness, and skin glow.…”

“…Good skin quality is defined as healthy, undamaged, youthful in appearance, and it can be described across all ethnicities by four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): skin tone evenness, skin surface evenness, skin firmness, and skin glow. 17 Baseline hormonal variation also exerts a great influence on the skin. Although testosterone may yield a denser collagen network, the skin becomes thicker with more visible pores and higher secretion of sebum and sweat.…”

Target‐Specific Sandwich Technique: Facial rejuvenation leveraging CPM technology

“…One factor commonly overlooked by injectors during HA filler treatments is a patient's tissue sagging dynamics. Compared with age-matched Caucasians, Asians have slight differences in tissue structure 11 and manifestations of facial aging. 12 Midfacial sagging and superficial rhytids tend to develop later in life in Asians due to their higher quantity and quality of connective tissues.…”

“…One factor commonly overlooked by injectors during HA filler treatments is a patient's tissue sagging dynamics. Compared with age‐matched Caucasians, Asians have slight differences in tissue structure 11 and manifestations of facial aging 12 13 .…”

Facial Skin Revitalization with Cohesive Polydensified Matrix-HA20G: Results from a Randomized Multicenter Clinical Study

“…2 The consensus features a novel HA product intentionally designed for revitalization of early-onset photodamaged facial skin characterized by dehydration, roughness, and lack of elasticity and firmness. 2,4,5 This novel product is a cohesive polydensified matrix-HA + glycerol (CPM-HA20G; Belotero Revive, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany); it is a CE-marked, sterile, resorbable, viscoelastic, transparent, cross-linked sodium hyaluronate gel (20.0 mg/ml) of nonanimal origin containing glycerol (17.5 mg/ml). The product is administered in one or three sessions into the mid to deep dermis using micropuncture, a technique which involves injecting micro aliquots of filler over the entire treatment area.…”