2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin-fixed scapula trackers: A comparison of two dynamic methods across a range of calibration positions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible to reduce the errors at higher arm elevation angles by performing the calibration of the anatomical landmarks with the arm elevated 32 . However, this increases the error at lower arm elevation angles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible to reduce the errors at higher arm elevation angles by performing the calibration of the anatomical landmarks with the arm elevated 32 . However, this increases the error at lower arm elevation angles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The valid use of this method, however, depends on the ability to accurately apply the cluster of markers, the position of which has been shown to affect results 31 , calibrate anatomical landmarks 32 and ensuring arm movements are within a valid range of motion (i.e. below 120° arm elevation) 29 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of the scapular movement in the symptomatic shoulder were obtained using the method described by Shaheen et al (2011) [Shaheen et al, 2011b]. The scapula locator: a tripod device with three pegs on the scapula acromial angle, inferior angle and the root of the scapular spine was used to obtain the scapular measurements.…”
Section: Scapular Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in part because of the difficulties involved in obtaining in-vivo measurements of the scapular movement [Hill et al, 2007, Kontaxis et al, 2009. Recently, a number of studies have developed methods to obtain scapular kinematics in-vivo with relatively high accuracies [Brochard et al, 2011, Prinold et al, 2011, Shaheen et al, 2011a, Shaheen et al, 2011b, Warner et al, 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although substantial work has been done in validating the accuracy of non-invasive, skin-based measurement methods of tracking the scapula (Lempereur et al, 2014), errors due to skin movement are still prevalent, especially in shoulder elevation above 90° (Borstad and Ludewig 2002;Ludewig et al, 2004;Prinold et al, 2011;van Andel et al, 2009;Warner et al, 2012). It has been suggested that modifying marker design in combination with adhering to current recommendations regarding attachment location of skin-based marker clusters placed over the scapula could improve the accuracy of this measurement method (Lempereur et al, 2014).…”
Section: Challenges In the Measurement Of Scapular Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%