2021
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.104.l032801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin effect in neutron transport theory

Abstract: We identify a neutron-flux "skin effect" in the context of neutron transport theory. The skin effect, which emerges as a boundary layer at material interfaces, plays a critical role in a correct description of transport phenomena. A correct accounting of the boundary-layer structure helps bypass computational difficulties reported in the literature over the last several decades, and should lead to efficient numerical methods for neutron transport in two and three dimensions.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cients for the spine, the spinal chord, and the trachea will remain fixed in the reconstruction process (in accordance with the values provided in [37]), since tumoral angiogenesis is only expected to exist in the soft tissue. Additionally, we restrict the presence of tumor inclusions to regions slightly away from the neck boundary, so as to avoid the error amplification associated with the existence of exponential boundary layers [39] (a full treatment of such nearboundary imaging configurations is left for future work). Accordingly, the value of the absorption coefficient in the proximity of the boundary is set to the background tissue value a(x) = a b (x) at all points closer than 0.5cm from the boundary.…”
Section: Neck Tumor Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cients for the spine, the spinal chord, and the trachea will remain fixed in the reconstruction process (in accordance with the values provided in [37]), since tumoral angiogenesis is only expected to exist in the soft tissue. Additionally, we restrict the presence of tumor inclusions to regions slightly away from the neck boundary, so as to avoid the error amplification associated with the existence of exponential boundary layers [39] (a full treatment of such nearboundary imaging configurations is left for future work). Accordingly, the value of the absorption coefficient in the proximity of the boundary is set to the background tissue value a(x) = a b (x) at all points closer than 0.5cm from the boundary.…”
Section: Neck Tumor Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%