Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin Drag Displays

Abstract: We propose a new type of tactile displays that drag a physical tactor across the skin in 2D. We call this skin drag. We demonstrate how this allows us to communicate geometric shapes or characters to users. The main benefit of our approach is that it simultaneously produces two types of stimuli, i.e., (1) it moves a tactile stimulus across skin locations and (2) it stretches the user's skin. Skin drag thereby combines the essential stimuli produced by vibrotactile and skin stretch. In our study, skin drag allo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving points, providing richer information (such as start & end locations, direction of motion and rate of movement, all of which are masked at higher speeds), are better recognised than multi-points pattern. This has already been demonstrated for contact devices by Ion et al [8] who used unistroke patterns. We believe the distinction to hold between low and high frequency mid-air tactile patterns too.…”
Section: Haptic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Moving points, providing richer information (such as start & end locations, direction of motion and rate of movement, all of which are masked at higher speeds), are better recognised than multi-points pattern. This has already been demonstrated for contact devices by Ion et al [8] who used unistroke patterns. We believe the distinction to hold between low and high frequency mid-air tactile patterns too.…”
Section: Haptic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, instead of asking the users to draw what they perceived [4], we used a "multiple choice" approach, with training on the multiple shapes, following a similar approach to previous work [11]. The results showed a low discriminative sensation, and do not deviate much from previous research evaluating shape discrimination on a forearm [4,11] Shape discrimination performance might be better when the presented shapes are larger. However, due to the limited form factor of our apparatus, we did not test this hypothesis in our current work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Smartwatch: Wristbands and smartwatches already incorporate haptic interfaces, such as vibration motors, and there has been a growing interest in HCI to add different types of haptic feedback. Examples include air poking [25] or skin dragging [11]. MAGHair could add value to the existing form factor of a watch by adding extra layers and internal coils to the existing PCBs.…”
Section: Wearable Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous works presented vibrotactile systems for the torso using vests (Lindeman et al 2004;Konishi et al 2016;Jones et al 2004;Wu et al 2010). While vibrotactile feedback has a wide array of applications, it remains limited; as vibrations cannot stimulate sensations like shear forces or strong impact (Ion et al 2015). Also, feedback is constrained to the area where the vibrotactile motors are fixed on.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%