2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac3bc4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin dose contamination conversion coefficients. Benchmark with three simulation codes

Abstract: Handling of radioactive material by operators can lead to contamination at the surface of the skin in case of an accident. The quantification of the dose received by the skin due to a contamination scenario is performed by means of dedicated dose coefficients as it is the case for other radiation protection dose quantities described in the literature. However, most available coefficients do not match realistic scenarios according to state-of-the-art of science and technology. Therefore, this work deals with de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. The quantitative and qualitative agreement has been observed between these two class results [7]. The only difference could be the methods used to calculate the dose rate and SDCC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…al. The quantitative and qualitative agreement has been observed between these two class results [7]. The only difference could be the methods used to calculate the dose rate and SDCC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Given the following equation, the Skin dose contamination of the 252 Cf radionuclide using SDCC for wide energy regions will be extracted [7]:…”
Section: Mcnpx Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess the potential differences related to other MC approaches, we calculated the skin dose for 188 Re considering its spectrum and interpolating the data reported in Table 3 of Appendix of the recently published paper 21 . Limited to this experimental set‐up, the percentage relative differences on calculated skin contamination dose using MCNP and GEANT4 resulted in 0.55% and 0.48% higher than the one calculated using FLUKA, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q C has been updated to include the last ICRP updates, ICRP 130-151 [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Q D has been updated and split into two values Q D,skin and Q D,ing that rely respectively on skin dose due to contamination [12] and ingestion dose taken from ICRP 130-151. Q E has been updated to comply with ICRP 144 [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%