2020 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Information Security (ICSPIS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icspis51252.2020.9340143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin Cancer Classification Model Based on VGG 19 and Transfer Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The core of any artificial intelligence-based algorithm lies in the collection of a high-quality dataset, which is subsequently employed for model training and testing. Using this trained model, the algorithms help to find different patterns and insights into those patterns [ [1] , [9] ].…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The core of any artificial intelligence-based algorithm lies in the collection of a high-quality dataset, which is subsequently employed for model training and testing. Using this trained model, the algorithms help to find different patterns and insights into those patterns [ [1] , [9] ].…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Different methods for data validation are employed to convert the initial raw dataset into a refined version. These techniques include procedures such as eliminating noise, human-assisted labeling to establish ground truth, resizing images, as well as applying zoom and rotation transformations [1 , 7] . Factors such as image quality, severity of the illness, and demographic elements are being carefully considered.…”
Section: Value Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the skin cancer classification model based on VGG-19 and transfer learning, model training and test accuracy were obtained by using the Human Against Machine dataset at a rate of 98.50% and 97.50%, respectively. Also, the model training and test loss were obtained as 0.009 and 0.119, respectively (Abuared et al, 2020).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCNN model which was processed was not overly broad. Using additional information on images potentially improves network performance and robustness [10]. Recently proposed a method of extracting boundaries and identifying lesions via deep neural networks.…”
Section: Image Preprocessing and Lesion Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%