2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43340-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin and gut microbiomes of tadpoles vary differently with host and water environment: a short-term experiment using 16S metabarcoding

Bárbara Santos,
Filipa M. S. Martins,
Joana Sabino-Pinto
et al.

Abstract: The host-microbiome community is influenced by several host and environmental factors. In order to disentangle the individual effects of host and environment, we performed a laboratory experiment to assess the effects of the exposure to different water sources on the skin and gut microbiome of two amphibian species (Pelophylax perezi and Bufo spinosus). We observed that the bacterial communities greatly varied with water environment and host identity. Tadpoles of B. spinosus collected from a waterbody with poo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…variations in light, temperature, or UV exposure) and thus internal cavities may represent a more stable environment relative to the environment experienced by a skin community (Costello et al 2009 ). Secondly, internal cavities are under reduced colonization or invasion pressure relative to a skin microbiota; potential colonizers of internal cavities must be introduced through breathing or food consumption compared to a skin microbiota, which is exposed to the entire ‘microbial soup’ of the environment (Grönroos et al 2019 , Harrison et al 2019 , Vila et al 2019 , Berggren et al 2023 , Santos et al 2023 ). Internal cavities of migratory organisms may be under even less colonization pressure during migration due to fasting or altered feeding regimes, which may reduce exposure to new organisms during the migratory process (Klinner et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Insight From Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…variations in light, temperature, or UV exposure) and thus internal cavities may represent a more stable environment relative to the environment experienced by a skin community (Costello et al 2009 ). Secondly, internal cavities are under reduced colonization or invasion pressure relative to a skin microbiota; potential colonizers of internal cavities must be introduced through breathing or food consumption compared to a skin microbiota, which is exposed to the entire ‘microbial soup’ of the environment (Grönroos et al 2019 , Harrison et al 2019 , Vila et al 2019 , Berggren et al 2023 , Santos et al 2023 ). Internal cavities of migratory organisms may be under even less colonization pressure during migration due to fasting or altered feeding regimes, which may reduce exposure to new organisms during the migratory process (Klinner et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Insight From Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%