1969
DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1969.10665433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin and Carbon Dioxide Laser Radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9, the simulated damage threshold radiant exposures for CO 2 ͑10.6 m͒ laser irradiation are compared with the published pigskin damage threshold data. 27 The higher prediction of threshold radiant exposure at 20 s was due to the overestimation of evaporative cooling rate. Excluding that point, good agreement was observed between the opticalthermal-damage model and experimental results.…”
Section: Predicted Thermal Damagementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9, the simulated damage threshold radiant exposures for CO 2 ͑10.6 m͒ laser irradiation are compared with the published pigskin damage threshold data. 27 The higher prediction of threshold radiant exposure at 20 s was due to the overestimation of evaporative cooling rate. Excluding that point, good agreement was observed between the opticalthermal-damage model and experimental results.…”
Section: Predicted Thermal Damagementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure 9 is a comparison of the simulated damage thresholds and the pigskin damage threshold data. 27 The predicted damage thresholds for 10.6-m ͑CO 2 laser͒ and 2.0-m laser irradiation as a function of exposure duration are compared in Fig. 10.…”
Section: Damage Predictions By the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found an exposure time-dependent difference in the severity of morphological lesions between treatment with 91 J/cm 2 (1.5 W/cm 2 x min) and 137 J/cm 2 (2.3 W/cm 2 x min). It has been reported that CO 2 laser treatment (0.2-50 s, beam diameter 1.9 cm, 0.69-13.6 W/cm 2 ) induces exposure time and dose-dependent macroscopic lesions in the porcine skin, similar to thermal burns (Brownell et al 1969). Similar to the results of the present study, dose-dependent lesions, such as shrinking and flattening of epidermal cells (epidermal necrosis), separation between epidermis and dermis, and dermal necrosis were reported by Laor et al (1969), after treatment of mice skin (7-100 J/pulse, pulse duration 1 ms, 694 nm, spot size 1-2 mm and 300-900 J/pulse, 1060 nm, spot size 1-2 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in-vivo models were Yorkshire, White, Handford (lightly pigmented), Yucatan (strongly pigmented) porcine flanks and lightly/strongly pigmented human forearms. References are [1,2,4,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] (see also Paper by Bruce Stuck et al in these proceedings). Data given at ≤1h-and 24/48hreadings were pooled together since the average ratio is 1.08 (18 data couples).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%