1996
DOI: 10.1016/0738-081x(95)00150-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin aging and photoaging: An outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ROS cause modifications of protein that results in functional changes of enzymatic proteins (Stadtman, 1992;Katiyar et al 2001b). ROS are responsible for photoxidative damage on nucleic acids, lipids, and activation of transcription factors that control the expression of genes involved in tumor promotion (Goihman-Yahr, 1996;Naylor, 1997;Griffiths et al, 1998). UV radiation in the keratinocytes is directly involved in cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation, which is implicated in photocarcinogenesis (Kripke et al, 1992;Burren et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These ROS cause modifications of protein that results in functional changes of enzymatic proteins (Stadtman, 1992;Katiyar et al 2001b). ROS are responsible for photoxidative damage on nucleic acids, lipids, and activation of transcription factors that control the expression of genes involved in tumor promotion (Goihman-Yahr, 1996;Naylor, 1997;Griffiths et al, 1998). UV radiation in the keratinocytes is directly involved in cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation, which is implicated in photocarcinogenesis (Kripke et al, 1992;Burren et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data suggest that EGCG protects against the adverse effects of UV radiation via modulaIntroduction Solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation, particularly its UVB (290-320 nm) spectrum, is the primary cause of skin cancer and other cutaneous pathologies in the human population, more so in Caucasian individuals (Mukhtar and Elmets, 1996;Greenlee et al, 2000). Experimental studies have shown that solar UV radiation elicits many adverse biological effects in the skin, including hyperpigmentation, erythema, photoaging, immunosuppression, and cancer (Goihman-Yahr, 1996;Ananthaswamy et al, 1997;DeGruijil, 1999;Afaq and Mukhtar, 2001). UV radiation to mammalian skin is known to alter cellular function via DNA damage (Eller et al, 1997;Vink et al, 1997;Katiyar et al, 2000), generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Morita et al, 1997;Scharffetter-Kochanek et al, 1997;Katiyar et al, 2001a, b), and the resultant alterations in a variety of signaling events (Gilchrest et al, 1996;Knebel et al, 1996;Rosette and Karin, 1996;Iordanov et al, 1997;Chen et al, 1999;Lefort et al, 2001;Pfundt et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Chronic exposure of mammalian skin to UV radiation induces a number of biological responses, including development of erythema, edema, sunburn cell formation, hyperplasia, immune suppression, DNA damage, photoaging and melanogenesis. These alterations are directly or indirectly involved in the development of skin cancer [1][2][3] . UV radiation is a very potent initiator of photochemical reactions through excitation of electrons and this can result in energy transfer or chemical modification of the exposed molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4) Chronic exposure of mammalian skin to solar UV irradiation induces a number of biological responses, including erythema, edema, sunburn cell formation, hyperplastic responses, photoaging, and skin-cancer development. [5][6][7][8][9][10] The skin damage is not caused entirely by UVB. UVA appears to participate greatly in the damage.…”
Section: 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%