2020
DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2020.1848242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skills’ sets and shared benefits: perceptions of resettled people from the Yangtze-Huai River Diversion Project in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our objective in this article is to demonstrate the importance of RD for understanding the long-term development prospects of displaced people and the communities that are required, under the same involuntary displacement process, to accommodate them. Our work confirms that resettlement remains synonymous with impoverishment (Koranteng & Shi, 2018;Wilmsen et al, 2019), and that the burdens often fall disparately on already disadvantaged individuals and communities (Cooke et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2019;Xu et al, 2020;Shi & Shang, 2020).…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our objective in this article is to demonstrate the importance of RD for understanding the long-term development prospects of displaced people and the communities that are required, under the same involuntary displacement process, to accommodate them. Our work confirms that resettlement remains synonymous with impoverishment (Koranteng & Shi, 2018;Wilmsen et al, 2019), and that the burdens often fall disparately on already disadvantaged individuals and communities (Cooke et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2019;Xu et al, 2020;Shi & Shang, 2020).…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…The document, titled the World Bank working guidelines: involuntary resettlement (operational guidelines OD4.30), pointed out that priority should be given to the resettlement issue and that the best scheme should be selected in the early planning stage of the project [19]. The inadequacy of the World Bank document is that it advises that the compensation claim for the resettlers be paid in full before the relocation and that compensation not involve assistance for the problems and difficulties faced by the resettlers after the relocation [20]. The resettlement policy focuses mainly on project construction while ignoring concerns about the development of resettlers, resulting in insufficient resettlement funds and prominent environmental problems [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models have been derived and developed, including Cernea's IRR model [30], Scudder and Colson's "stage" model [35,36], Downing and Garcia-Downing's "Routine/Dissonant Culture" and psycho-socio-culture model [37], de Wet's spatial and complexity model [38], Shi's five-stages resettlement system evolutionary model [39,40], nature resources conversion model [39,40], Shi and Shang's land asset securitization model [41], and Zhang's relative deprivation model [42], etc. Many new approaches were proposed and implemented world-wide, such as resettlement legislation [43], investment-impetus [44], resettlement development [45], benefit-sharing [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53], land asset securitization [1], policyplan-implementation management [54][55][56][57], stakeholders' participatory development and community engagement [58][59][60], social stability risk assessment [61], environment and social impact assessment and management (ESIAM) [62,63]. However, all these types of research are still on the way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%