Abstract:Job security can never be taken for granted, especially in times of rapid, widespread and unexpected social and economic change. These changes can force workers to transition to new jobs. This may be because new technologies emerge or production is moved abroad. Perhaps it is a global crisis, such as COVID-19, which shutters industries and displaces labor en masse. Regardless of the impetus, people are faced with the challenge of moving between jobs to find new work. Successful transitions typically occur when… Show more
“… It misses vacancies that are not posted online. Carnevale, Jayasundera and Repnikov (2014 [13]) compare vacancies from survey data according to the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) from the US Bureau of Labour Statistics, a representative survey of 16 000 US businesses, with BGT data for 2013. They find that roughly 70% of vacancies were posted online, with vacancies requiring a college degree significantly more likely to be posted online compared to jobs with lower education requirements.…”
“…peripheral vision. 13 The correlation matrix between applications and abilities is then calculated as the share of respondents who thought that a given AI application could be used for a given ability. These abilities are subsequently linked to occupations using the O*NET database.…”
Section: Task-based Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Felten, Raj and Seamans, 2021[35]). 13 The background of the gig workers is not known and so they may not necessarily be AI experts. This could be a potential weakness of this indicator.…”
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. 2 DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2021)12 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EMPLOYMENT Unclassified
AcknowledgementsThis publication contributes to the OECD's Artificial Intelligence in Work, Innovation, Productivity and Skills (AI-WIPS) programme, which provides policymakers with new evidence and analysis to keep abreast of the fast-evolving changes in AI capabilities and diffusion and their implications for the world of work. The programme aims to help ensure that adoption of AI in the world of work is effective, beneficial to all, peoplecentred and accepted by the population at large. AI-WIPS is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (BMAS) and will complement the work of the German AI Observatory in the Ministry's Policy Lab Digital, Work & Society. For more information, visit https://oecd.ai/work-innovationproductivity-skills and https://denkfabrik-bmas.de/. Special thanks must go to Stijn Broecke for his supervision of the project and to Mark Keese for his guidance and support throughout the project. The report also benefitted from helpful comments provided by colleagues from the Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Andrew Green, Marguerita Lane, Luca Marcolin and Stefan Thewissen) and from the Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation (Lea Samek). Thanks to Katerina Kodlova for providing publication support. The comments and feedback received from participants in the February 2021 OECD Expert Meeting on AI indicators (Nik
“… It misses vacancies that are not posted online. Carnevale, Jayasundera and Repnikov (2014 [13]) compare vacancies from survey data according to the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) from the US Bureau of Labour Statistics, a representative survey of 16 000 US businesses, with BGT data for 2013. They find that roughly 70% of vacancies were posted online, with vacancies requiring a college degree significantly more likely to be posted online compared to jobs with lower education requirements.…”
“…peripheral vision. 13 The correlation matrix between applications and abilities is then calculated as the share of respondents who thought that a given AI application could be used for a given ability. These abilities are subsequently linked to occupations using the O*NET database.…”
Section: Task-based Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Felten, Raj and Seamans, 2021[35]). 13 The background of the gig workers is not known and so they may not necessarily be AI experts. This could be a potential weakness of this indicator.…”
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. 2 DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2021)12 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EMPLOYMENT Unclassified
AcknowledgementsThis publication contributes to the OECD's Artificial Intelligence in Work, Innovation, Productivity and Skills (AI-WIPS) programme, which provides policymakers with new evidence and analysis to keep abreast of the fast-evolving changes in AI capabilities and diffusion and their implications for the world of work. The programme aims to help ensure that adoption of AI in the world of work is effective, beneficial to all, peoplecentred and accepted by the population at large. AI-WIPS is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (BMAS) and will complement the work of the German AI Observatory in the Ministry's Policy Lab Digital, Work & Society. For more information, visit https://oecd.ai/work-innovationproductivity-skills and https://denkfabrik-bmas.de/. Special thanks must go to Stijn Broecke for his supervision of the project and to Mark Keese for his guidance and support throughout the project. The report also benefitted from helpful comments provided by colleagues from the Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Andrew Green, Marguerita Lane, Luca Marcolin and Stefan Thewissen) and from the Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation (Lea Samek). Thanks to Katerina Kodlova for providing publication support. The comments and feedback received from participants in the February 2021 OECD Expert Meeting on AI indicators (Nik
“…Dawson et al ( 2021 ) develop the skills-space or skills-similarity indicator. This approach defines two skills as similar if they often occur together in BGT job postings and are both simultaneously important for the job posting.…”
Section: Indicators Of Occupational Exposure To Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, TensorFlow is a deep learning framework introduced in 2016. Many job postings now list it as a requirement without additionally specifying “deep learning” (Dawson et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Indicators Of Occupational Exposure To Aimentioning
Recent years have seen impressive advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and this has stoked renewed concern about the impact of technological progress on the labor market, including on worker displacement. This paper looks at the possible links between AI and employment in a cross-country context. It adapts the AI occupational impact measure developed by Felten, Raj and Seamans—an indicator measuring the degree to which occupations rely on abilities in which AI has made the most progress—and extends it to 23 OECD countries. Overall, there appears to be no clear relationship between AI exposure and employment growth. However, in occupations where computer use is high, greater exposure to AI is linked to higher employment growth. The paper also finds suggestive evidence of a negative relationship between AI exposure and growth in average hours worked among occupations where computer use is low. One possible explanation is that partial automation by AI increases productivity directly as well as by shifting the task composition of occupations toward higher value-added tasks. This increase in labor productivity and output counteracts the direct displacement effect of automation through AI for workers with good digital skills, who may find it easier to use AI effectively and shift to non-automatable, higher-value added tasks within their occupations. The opposite could be true for workers with poor digital skills, who may not be able to interact efficiently with AI and thus reap all potential benefits of the technology1.
Digitalization, automation, robotization and green transition are key current drivers changing the labour markets and the structure of skills needed to perform tasks within jobs. Mitigating skills shortages in this dynamic world requires an adequate response from key stakeholders. However, recommendations derived from the traditional data sources, which lack granularity or are available with a significant time lag, may not address the emerging issues rightly. At the same time, society’s increasing reliance on the use of the Internet for day-to-day needs, including the way individuals search for a job and match with employers, generates a considerable amount of timely and high granularity data. Analysing such nontraditional data as content of online job advertisements may help understand emerging issues across sectors and regions and allow policy makers to act accordingly. In this chapter, we are drawing on experience setting the Cedefop project based on big data and presenting examples of other numerous research projects to confirm the potential of using nontraditional sources of information in addressing a variety of research questions related to the topic of changing skills in a changing world.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.