2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210654
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ski can negatively regulates macrophage differentiation through its interaction with PU.1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, these results suggest that PU.1 and HDAC1 recognize two separate regions of EVI1, and we concluded that recruitment of corepressor to a PU.1-dependent promoter is not the major mechanism of repression by EVI1. To further confirm these results and to determine whether the interaction between EVI1 and PU.1 contributes to the repression of PU.1-dependent genes, we used a reporter plasmid that contains one PU.1-binding site in the M-CSFR promoter linked to the luciferase gene (7,41). This reporter plasmid and a plasmid expressing PU.1 were used in transient transfections of NIH3T3 cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Taken together, these results suggest that PU.1 and HDAC1 recognize two separate regions of EVI1, and we concluded that recruitment of corepressor to a PU.1-dependent promoter is not the major mechanism of repression by EVI1. To further confirm these results and to determine whether the interaction between EVI1 and PU.1 contributes to the repression of PU.1-dependent genes, we used a reporter plasmid that contains one PU.1-binding site in the M-CSFR promoter linked to the luciferase gene (7,41). This reporter plasmid and a plasmid expressing PU.1 were used in transient transfections of NIH3T3 cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…SHARPIN dimerization and its interaction with both the N and C SKI repressor activity. For this, we expressed WT or R8 mutant SKI and examined (i) their recruitment to the SOX10 and PAX3 enhancers, (ii) HDAC activity, (iii) histone acetylation (H3K27ac), and (iv) cooccupancy of BRD4 (31)(32)(33). These studies revealed that, compared with WT SKI, R8 mutant SKI displayed enhanced recruitment at the SOX10 and PAX3 enhancers, increased HDAC, reduced H3K27ac, and reduced BRD4 recruitment ( Figure 5J).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Enhanced PU.1 activity favors monocytic commitment of the granulocyte-monocyte progenitor. 44 Proteins (such as Ski 45 ) and microRNAs (such as miR-424 46 ) are reported through interaction with PU.1 to antagonize or synergize its transcriptional activity and finally affect monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Here, we reported that onzin interacted with PU.1 and partially inhibited PU.1 transcriptional activity, which may explain how onzin negatively partially regulated PMA-induced leukemia cell differentiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%