2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skewness correction and quality evaluation of plug seedling images based on Canny operator and Hough transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…true area se > threshold sed and threshold sud < area su < threshold suu f alse else (7) where area se is the area of seedling region; area su is the area of the substrate region; threshold sed is the seedling area lower threshold; threshold sud and threshold suu are the substrate region lower threshold and upper threshold. The defect of substrate damage needs to be identified by area shape analysis.…”
Section: Seedling Defects Defects' Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…true area se > threshold sed and threshold sud < area su < threshold suu f alse else (7) where area se is the area of seedling region; area su is the area of the substrate region; threshold sed is the seedling area lower threshold; threshold sud and threshold suu are the substrate region lower threshold and upper threshold. The defect of substrate damage needs to be identified by area shape analysis.…”
Section: Seedling Defects Defects' Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the research on defect seedling identification technology included seedling information acquisition technology [1][2][3], seedling and background segmentation [4,5], and seedling defect identification technology [6][7][8]. Advanced technologies such as hyperspectral image sensors, near-infrared image sensors, machine learning techniques, and artificial neural network technologies have played an important role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the data augmentation, such as the flip, brightness and saturation change, we enlarged the training data and created samples in different status, and this classification method we constructed still had a high accuracy. It showed strong robustness in classification ability against the traditional image processing method [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Because the different brightness or saturation of image samples may affect the segmentation result or any other algorithm effect in traditional image processing, so as to reduce the accuracy.…”
Section: Plug Seedlings Classification Test Rusultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al used tomato seedlings as test samples and applied a morphological-based watershed algorithm to complete leaf edge segmentation, extracting each leaf area, and leaf circumference of the seedlings in a plug tray was used to identify the seedlings; recognition accuracy reached 98% [1]. Tong et al aimed at the leaf overlap of the plug seedlings, proposed a decision-making method combining the central information of the leaflet area and improved the watershed method to segment the seedlings, and then calculated the seedling leaf area to realize the seedling identification judgment; the recognition accuracy rate was 95% [2,3]. Qingchun et al used structured light and industrial camera methods to identify seedlings by detecting leaf area and stem height, and the recognition accuracy was over 90% [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of Hough transform algorithm lead to its high time and space complexity, and in the process of detection, it can only determine the direction of the line and lose the length information of the line segment, so it is not suitable for lane line detection directly. 17,18 The least square method is only suitable for the data with less noise, but in many cases, some points which deviate from the curve obviously need to be discarded, so it is not suitable for lane line fitting. RANSAC curve fitting method is an improvement of the least square method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%