1994
DOI: 10.1017/s096012950000044x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sketches and computation – II: dynamic evaluation and applications

Abstract: In the first part of this paper (Duval and Reynaud 1994), we defined a categorical framework, based on the notion of sketch, for specification and evaluation in the senses of algebraic specifications and algebraic programming. Static evaluation in quasi-projective sketches was defined in Part I; in this paper, dynamic evaluation is introduced. It deals with more general structures, which may have no initial model. Until now, this process has not been used in algebraic specification systems, but computer algebr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our theory has many connections with the following papers ( [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,15]), based on ( [1,3,4,14]), and with the theory of coherent toposes as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Our theory has many connections with the following papers ( [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,15]), based on ( [1,3,4,14]), and with the theory of coherent toposes as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…One may regard dynamic evaluation as a computer algebra counterpart of the concept of non-deterministic evaluation from theoretical computer science. The strategy of dynamic evaluation has been extended to transcendental parameters [17,22], real algebraic numbers in [16], and more general algebraic structures [25, chapter 8].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can check that the multiplicity M of x * is 18. This can be computed as the dimension of the Q -algebra Q[[x 1 , x 2 , x 3 + 1]]/(F) thanks to the software Singular [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%