2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30945-3_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletons and Fans of Logarithmic Structures

Abstract: Introduction 1 2. Toric varieties and toroidal embeddings 5 3. Logarithmic structures 9 4. Kato fans and resolution of singularities 13 5. Artin fans 21 6. Algebraic applications of Artin fans 27 7. Skeletons and tropicalization 32 8. Analytification of Artin fans 42 9. Where we are, where we want to go 45 References 47

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In and (also see and ), the authors develop the theory of Artin fans , an incarnation of the theory of Kato fans in the category of logarithmic algebraic stacks that is more suitable to deal with logarithmic structures that have monodromy. In particuar, for every logarithmic scheme there is an Artin fan AX and an essentially unique strict morphism XscriptAX that is a lift of the characteristic morphism to this category.…”
Section: Overview and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In and (also see and ), the authors develop the theory of Artin fans , an incarnation of the theory of Kato fans in the category of logarithmic algebraic stacks that is more suitable to deal with logarithmic structures that have monodromy. In particuar, for every logarithmic scheme there is an Artin fan AX and an essentially unique strict morphism XscriptAX that is a lift of the characteristic morphism to this category.…”
Section: Overview and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to a general monoidal space, a fan consists of a small (typically finite) number of points; indeed, there is a bijection between the affine open sets of a fan and its points (c.f. Lemma 4.6, [1]). Certain sufficiently nice logarithmic schemes (X, M X , O X ) (analogous to our manifolds with embedded boundary faces) are associated to a canonical fan F via a morphism (X, M ♯ X ) → F which essentially collapses various strata (analogous to our interiors of boundary faces) down to points.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…That general manifolds (without embedded boundary faces) do not admit monoidal complexes can be compared to the fact that not all logarithmic schemes admit fans [1]. To define blow-up for manifolds in general, it should still be possible to explicitly patch together the local constructions in §3.1 for a suitable notion of refinement of the monoidal space (M, B ♯ M ).…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If E is a Gorenstein curve with a genus 1 singularity then ω E is generated in a neighborhood of its singular point by a meromorphic form (4), with c ′ = 0, where the x i are local parameters for the branches of E at the singular point.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%