2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.08.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal relapse after mandibular setback in skeletal class III with high mandibular plane angle patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Furthermore, Imerb et al stated that a high mandibular plane angle had less stability than a normal mandibular plane angle. 21 However, there were benefits in performing dental decompensation before surgery using the conventional approach. 22,23 From our finding that the lower incisors proclined after decompensation and retroclined after the postsurgical period, round-tripping tooth movement was observed, which was considered an adverse effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 Furthermore, Imerb et al stated that a high mandibular plane angle had less stability than a normal mandibular plane angle. 21 However, there were benefits in performing dental decompensation before surgery using the conventional approach. 22,23 From our finding that the lower incisors proclined after decompensation and retroclined after the postsurgical period, round-tripping tooth movement was observed, which was considered an adverse effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 Furthermore, Imerb et al stated that a high mandibular plane angle had less stability than a normal mandibular plane angle. 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%