2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.101603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal muscle loss during chemotherapy and its association with survival and systemic treatment toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO prospective multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the included studies used the well-established cut-off values proposed by Martin et al and by Prado et al 1 , 12 There might be small differences regarding cm ²/m ² for women compared to Martin et al 1 , 12 Some studies did not use a similar, established approach, such as Gallois et al, which employed an internal cut-off value derived by the lowest sex specific quartile identified in the study. 20 In the study by Horii et al, the exact definition of LSMM is not even mentioned by the authors, which could lead to a possible bias and reduces possible reproduction of their results. 22 One can postulated that the cut-off values by Martin et al 12 , and Prado et al 1 are most commonly used in the literature and they can be considered as evident thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the included studies used the well-established cut-off values proposed by Martin et al and by Prado et al 1 , 12 There might be small differences regarding cm ²/m ² for women compared to Martin et al 1 , 12 Some studies did not use a similar, established approach, such as Gallois et al, which employed an internal cut-off value derived by the lowest sex specific quartile identified in the study. 20 In the study by Horii et al, the exact definition of LSMM is not even mentioned by the authors, which could lead to a possible bias and reduces possible reproduction of their results. 22 One can postulated that the cut-off values by Martin et al 12 , and Prado et al 1 are most commonly used in the literature and they can be considered as evident thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After thorough review, 15 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] The primary aim of the systematic review was to investigate the influence of LSMM on OS by means of the effect measure hazard ratio. Moreover, the frequency of sarcopenia was assessed in the analyzed studies.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Progressive muscle wasting may be a stronger prognostic factor than a single pre-treatment measurement. In a recent study in patients with metastatic CRC, continuing muscle loss but not pre-treatment sarcopenia was prognostic of worse OS [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the included studies. Among the studies published between 20 16 and 2022, 8 studies [ 27 29 , 37 , 40 , 42 , 45 , 46 ] were from Asia, 7 studies [ 39 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 47 49 ] were from Europe and a separate study [ 38 ] from Brazil. All of the studies were retrospective cohort, and 68.75% of the included studies (11/16) were of high quality with an NOS score of ≥ 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%