2008
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal muscle contractions uncoupled from gravitational loading directly increase cortical bone blood flow rates in vivo

Abstract: The direct and indirect effects of muscle contraction on bone microcirculation and fluid flow are neither well documented nor explained. However, skeletal muscle contractions may affect the acquisition and maintenance of bone via stimulation of bone circulatory and interstitial fluid flow parameters. The purposes of this study were to assess the effects of transcutaneous electrical neuromuscular stimulation (TENS)-induced muscle contractions on cortical bone blood flow and bone mineral content, and to demonstr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(48 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Capillary endothelial cells have an impact on bone remodeling by synthesizing and releasing different molecules including free radicals, local regulatory factors (e.g., interleukin-6, nitric oxide), and growth factors that may inhibit osteoclast activity and stimulate osteoblast activity (McCarthy 2006;Parfitt 2000), therefore blood flow restriction in combination with resistance exercise might be affecting the secretory function of the endothelial cells leading to improvements in bone remodeling. Furthermore, even though the magnitude of mechanical loading during LI-VRT training sessions was low, fluid shifts occurring during muscular contractions (Caulkins et al 2009) may stimulate piezoelectric potentials on osteocytes to stimulate remodeling (Frost 2001). Finally, endocrine responses to resistance training (Kraemer and Ratamess 2005) may either directly affect bone metabolism, or may alter the mechanosensitivity of bone cells, leading to decreases in bone resorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Capillary endothelial cells have an impact on bone remodeling by synthesizing and releasing different molecules including free radicals, local regulatory factors (e.g., interleukin-6, nitric oxide), and growth factors that may inhibit osteoclast activity and stimulate osteoblast activity (McCarthy 2006;Parfitt 2000), therefore blood flow restriction in combination with resistance exercise might be affecting the secretory function of the endothelial cells leading to improvements in bone remodeling. Furthermore, even though the magnitude of mechanical loading during LI-VRT training sessions was low, fluid shifts occurring during muscular contractions (Caulkins et al 2009) may stimulate piezoelectric potentials on osteocytes to stimulate remodeling (Frost 2001). Finally, endocrine responses to resistance training (Kraemer and Ratamess 2005) may either directly affect bone metabolism, or may alter the mechanosensitivity of bone cells, leading to decreases in bone resorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Whether and how changes in mechanical loading and/or IMP may affect bone blood circulation and the tone of the intramedullary blood vessel is not clear (99), but it is likely that muscle contraction plays a role through the modulation of vascular resistance regulation the flow of blood exiting bone (102)(103). Further research in this area is required to understand whether skeletal blood perfusion and mechanoadaptation to exerciseinduced bone strain may induce synergistic effects on bone formation.…”
Section: Mechanoadaptation Of Bone and The Blood Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical loading has been demonstrated to induce skeletal IFF through two distinct mechanisms that give rise to distinct spatial patterns of flow: poroelastic interactions within the lacunar-canalicular system (LCS) between the interstitial fluid and bone tissue [15], [16], and intramedullary pressurization [2], [17], [18], [19]. Whereas poroelastic interactions within the LCS are expected to give rise to IFF primarily within the lacunar-canalicular network, pressurization of the intramedullary cavity is expected to result in significant levels of IFF at the endosteal surface as well as within the LCS due to the gross outward pressure gradient from the intramedullary cavity to the periosteal surface [2], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%