2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-013-9231-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal Morphology of Palaeocastor peninsulatus (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the Fort Logan Formation of Montana (early Arikareean): Ontogenetic and Paleoecological Interpretations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The robust cranium and broad, flat incisors of the John Day specimens are consistent with specialization for chisel-tooth digging behavior (Samuels and Van Valkenburgh 2009), which is supported for P. fossor by artifactual evidence within burrows (Martin and Bennett 1977). Palaeocastor peninsulatus has been inferred to be a primarily scratch digging species (Samuels and Van Valkenburgh 2009;Calede 2014). Flynn and Jacobs (2008) indicated the occurrence of P. fossor from the lower Turtle Cove Member of the John Day Formation, but from an uncertain locality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The robust cranium and broad, flat incisors of the John Day specimens are consistent with specialization for chisel-tooth digging behavior (Samuels and Van Valkenburgh 2009), which is supported for P. fossor by artifactual evidence within burrows (Martin and Bennett 1977). Palaeocastor peninsulatus has been inferred to be a primarily scratch digging species (Samuels and Van Valkenburgh 2009;Calede 2014). Flynn and Jacobs (2008) indicated the occurrence of P. fossor from the lower Turtle Cove Member of the John Day Formation, but from an uncertain locality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The skull and cheek-tooth row lengths of the P. fossor specimens described here overlap with those of P. peninsulatus specimens known from John Day (Tables 3-4). It is important to note that recent work by Stefen (2010) and Calede (2014) found neither skull size nor dental morphology may be useful in differentiating palaeocastorine beavers. Both size and crown morphology change dramatically as the teeth wear (Stefen 2010;Calede 2014), meaning the identification of fossil beavers by dental material alone is difficult.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations